Fair Game is an investigation into the proposal for transwomen to compete in women’s sport. We reject that idea on a scientific, ethical and philosophical basis. The paper includes analysis of the basic case for women’s sport, a clear distinction between sex and gender and a sharp critique of the proposals of@EthicsInSPORT.
〖丁】
3 years ago @Edit 3 years ago
〈公平競賽〉是一項針對「跨女參加女子運動」提案的調查。我們拒絕這個概念,基於科學、倫理與哲學的基礎。這論文包含基本的女子運動案例分析,清楚的區別生理性別與社會性別,還有犀利的批評@EthicsInSPORT的提案。
The science is clear: athletes who were born male but who identify as women and seek participation in women’s events have significant competitive advantages.
科學很清楚:出生性別為男性但自我認同為女人,尋求參與女子競賽的運動員,有顯著的競爭優勢。
Additionally, our ethical examination finds that while inclusion is an important objective, safety and fairness should be higher priorities when it comes to sport.
除此之外,我們的倫理檢視發現,儘管包容是一個重要的目標,在運動中,安全與公平應該是更高的優先事項。
In any event, gender identity (a subjective concept) is a poor basis for sports categories. It is biological sex (an objective fact) which drives the inherent differences in athletic advantage, and which makes sex-based categories in sport necessary to begin with.
〖丁】
3 years ago @Edit 3 years ago
在任何一項競賽中,要作為運動的分類基礎,性別認同(一項主觀的概念)是一個非常差的基礎。是生理性別(一項客觀事實)造就運動優勢的先天差異,這讓生理性別為基礎的運動分類成為必要。
We discuss and reject the idea that there is a ‘human right to sport’ and we argue for a ‘body-centred’ account of sport.
〖丁】
3 years ago @Edit 3 years ago
我們討論並且拒絕這項概念「運動的人權」,並且主張以身體為核心要素的運動。
We recommend a shift in the conversation around gender identity in sport. We propose a reconceptualization of sports categories, changing the “men’s” category to an “open” group, and the women’s category to an exclusive “female” group as per sex recorded at birth.
我們建議改變運動領域的對話,不再圍繞著性別認同。我們建議重新塑造運動分類的概念,將男子競賽改為公開競賽,女子競賽則獨屬於女性團體,生理性別依照出生紀錄。
〖丁】
3 years ago @Edit 3 years ago
論文第14頁的生理差距
第十八頁,抑制睪固酮至少12個月的跨女體能
喔喔我也很贊成取消男子組,改為不問性別的公開組,所有種類的性別都歡迎參加
其實我照字面翻反而有點詞不達意,但我又不想補太多字上去,所以翻譯的部分大家都可以討論還請見諒。
由此可見,跨性別不是弱勢啊!
已經是人類強權了,尤其是在運動賽事上,比輸男人,就去跟女人搶。