生活內底揣趣味(生活中找樂趣) says
3 years ago @Edit 3 years ago
「不遵守就不給聯邦教育基金」拜登簽署行政令:男女同廁,允許「男性」參加女子體育比賽
拜登簽署行政令:男女同廁,允許「男性」參加女子體育比賽「跨性別人士」不僅是經過手術後成為異性,還包括自認為是女性的生物男性。因此,批評人士認為,拜登打著「反歧視」的名義,實際上是歧視女性,如果跨性別人士參加運動會的話,自然女性運動員將再無優勢,而這將減少女性參加體育賽事的慾望。

【更新】行政命令原文:https://www.whitehouse.g...
https://imgs.plurk.com/QzH/AGI/FQb8V9IQHRaXZnJZiZjM73r9nF2_mt.jpg
#BidenErasedWomen #LGBTQ同志議題 #性別議題 #變性人 #PE2020US後續 #矯枉過正 #魔鼠黨綁架平權 #只有表面工夫的假平權 #性別友善廁所 #南方公園
latest #50
掰噗~ wonders
3 years ago
是嗎? (p-stare)
立即下載
生活中找樂趣 says
3 years ago
=分隔線=
生活中找樂趣 says
3 years ago
=分隔線=
生活中找樂趣 says
3 years ago @Edit 3 years ago
生活中找樂趣 says
3 years ago
=分隔線=
生活中找樂趣 says
3 years ago
=分隔線=
生活中找樂趣 says
3 years ago
=分隔線=
via [轉噗]【燐酸】南方四賤客真的是紀錄片
"Go Strong Woman, Go" (Original Music) - SOUTH PARK其實這集不算預言,只是看到新聞就馬上想到這一集。

當時就有很多州很進步地允許跨性別人士參加運動,還出現了跨性別格鬥選手把女性選手打成重傷的事。

南方跟時事速度很快,最快在新聞事件一周後就可以做出一集,所以才說真的是紀錄片類型動畫 (
生活內底揣趣味(生活中找樂趣) says
3 years ago @Edit 3 years ago
是說biological在這邊是「生理(男性)」吧,
翻譯成「生物男性」好像哪邊怪怪的
[轉LINE回應]

- 美國おわた

- 真正的女性運動員該出來該I didn't vote for this啦
"包括自認為是女性的生物男性。" 這個就是會被無限上綱、鑽法律漏洞的地方,就像之前加拿大那個案例一樣,更不用提比賽時候男性的體能優勢。之前變性選手參賽就有提到「未來應該規定一個最高體內睪酮素來決定該名選手是男性還是女性。」

但是現在拜登這法案是不是會靠杯說這種方法是歧視呢。
Astray_R
3 years ago
泡杯可可 坐下 喝一口可可
看著世界燃燒
就這樣做吧
一般是翻”生理”男/女
AntiaC: 對呀,正常情況沒人在翻什麼「生物男性」、「生物女性」。
親生父母也是說「生父」、「生母」較多,除非是比較生物領域的。
Astray_R: 要燒到我家旁邊惹,怕
感覺好像是外星人在描述人類的感覺🤣
XDDDDDD 或是其他物種在描述人類這樣wwwwww
Nicole951357: 喔喔 感謝支援,借轉噗首XD 我來看一下
Section 1. Policy.

Every person should be treated with respect and dignity and should be able to live without fear, no matter who they are or whom they love.
Children should be able to learn without worrying about whether they will be denied access to the restroom, the locker room, or school sports.
Adults should be able to earn a living and pursue a vocation knowing that they will not be fired, demoted, or mistreated because of whom they go home to or because how they dress does not conform to sex-based stereotypes.
People should be able to access healthcare and secure a roof over their heads without being subjected to sex discrimination.
All persons should receive equal treatment under the law, no matter their gender identity or sexual orientation.
These principles are reflected in the Constitution, which promises equal protection of the laws. These principles are also enshrined in our Nation’s anti-discrimination laws, (略)
In Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), the Supreme Court held that Title VII’s prohibition on discrimination “because of . . . sex” covers discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation.
(略)

Discrimination on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation manifests differently for different individuals, and it often overlaps with other forms of prohibited discrimination, including discrimination on the basis of race or disability.
=摘錄結束=
看了一下原文,基本上是沒問題,但就是怕被無限上綱(因為講得涵蓋傘很大),希望是不會爆出像是南方公園那種極端案例。
back to top