Results of random sample test: 4% of hospital staff ...
荷蘭布拉班特(Brabant)從3/6~3/9,對1097名醫院工作人員隨機抽樣測試,結果：3.9％感染了冠狀病毒
(#) % 因醫院而異，介於0％和10％之間。
(#)醫院感染的百分比可能反映了布拉班特人口中的感染數量。但這也可能意味著醫院工作人員中的感染%更高，因為他們的工作可以使他們更早地感染該病毒。
荷蘭布拉班特(Brabant)從3/6~3/9,對1097名醫院工作人員隨機抽樣測試,結果：3.9％感染了冠狀病毒
(#) % 因醫院而異，介於0％和10％之間。
(#)醫院感染的百分比可能反映了布拉班特人口中的感染數量。但這也可能意味著醫院工作人員中的感染%更高，因為他們的工作可以使他們更早地感染該病毒。
Two hundred patients were also tested. Of these patients, an average of 9 per cent was infected with the virus. Again, there are differences between hospitals. The people who were tested already had symptoms.
最後這一句加了之後就看不懂了
歹勢我截的不好，主要是這一整段看下來，加了最後一句之後，搞不清楚那1000多位醫護到底有沒有症狀
From 6 to 8 March 1097 hospital workers were tested of which 3.9 per cent was indeed infected with COVID-19. The percentages vary per hospital and are between 0 and 10 per cent.
From 6 to 8 March 1097 hospital workers were tested of which 3.9 per cent was indeed infected with COVID-19. The percentages vary per hospital and are between 0 and 10 per cent.
我覺得不管有沒有都隨機驗
這兩組數據要分開看的意思