大概意思是被判性侵兒童的男跨在更改身份文件後進入婦幼（跨性包容）庇護所

Another case raised in the report is that of a woman who was sexually abused in her teens and wrote to NHS Brighton to request that she had only women care for her. She received a letter from the trust saying: “We consider this to be bigotry.”

女性在遭受侵害後希望找女性照護者，被相關單位稱為「偏執」

好耳熟，不就之前那個舍監闖女宿浴室，然後學校說「我們性別平等所以雇用男人沒問題」

民調數據：
The People Polling survey found that 72% of the British population believe that women’s support services should state clearly whether they include male people who identify as women, and that 64% believe services should be allowed to exclude males who identify as women from female-only staff.

大概是：72%的民眾支持相關組織說明清楚機構內服務是不是包含男跨女，且有64%民眾認為相關機構應排除男跨女職員。

性犯罪補充：
Statistics show that one in five women are victims of sexual assault (or attempted assault) in their lifetime, and that 98% of the adults prosecuted for sexual offences are men.

數據顯示：五分之一的女性為性犯罪受害者（包含性侵未遂），且成年性犯罪者中有98%為男性。

完整報告：Women’s services: a sector silenced - Sex Matters

關於女性受刑人：
More than two-thirds of women in prison have experienced domestic abuse, and more than two-thirds of women who are convicted of criminal offences have suffered head injuries, with the overwhelming majority caused in adulthood by male partners.

超過三分之二的女性受刑人曾遭受家庭暴力，超過三分之二被判刑事犯罪的女性曾遭受頭部傷害，其中絕大多數是在成年後由男性伴侶造成的。

英國受暴女性安全網相關數據：

英國性犯罪數據：

其他民調：
8 in 10 agree that women who have been the victims of rape, sexual assault or domestic violence should be able to access support in a female-only environment.
80%的人同意性犯罪、家暴受害女性需要存女性空間的支持。

7 in 10 agree that services for women who are victims of rape, sexual assault or domestic violence should state whether they offer a female-only environment or include male people who identify as women.

70%的人認為性犯罪、家暴受害者支持服務需聲明他們是否提供純女性空間，或是組織內包含認同為女人的男性。

6 in 10 agree that services for women who are victims of rape, sexual assault or domestic violence, when advertising for female support workers, should be allowed to exclude men who identify as women from applying.

60%的人認為性犯罪、家暴受害者在申請、要求照護時，有權排除自認為女人的男性。

民調圖：

We commissioned this research in part to respond to the narrative advanced during debates about legal gender self-ID: that the women’s sector sees no conflict between women’s rights and the interests of men with transgender identities, and is unaffected by laws allowing people to change their sex as recognised by the state.

我們委託進行這項研究的部分原因是為了回應關於性別自我認同合法化的辯論中提出的說法：婦女部門認為，婦女的權利和具有跨性別身份認同的男性的利益之間不存在衝突，也不被自我宣稱性別的國家法律所影響。

In 2018, Stonewall and nfpResearch published a report on trans inclusion in domestic and sexual-violence services. It carried the logos of key women’s-sector organisations and painted a picture of a sector that accepts that “woman” is a term based on self-identity, not biology.

It implied that female survivors of male violence experience no negative impacts when they share support services with males who identify as women.

概要：2018年時由石牆跟民調公司的一份「跨性別包容的家庭暴力及性暴力」報告書上，帶有重要女性部門的標誌，且報告內聲明「女性身份」是基於性別認同，同時暗示性別自我宣稱不會對受暴倖存女性有任何危害。

哇這不是台灣現在的時間線嗎

More recently, a group of Scottish NGOs wrote to the UN Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women and Girls reprimanding her for intervening in the debate on self-ID in Scotland,

saying: “All rape crisis services in Scotland are inclusive of transwomen and have been for 15 years. In those 15 years, there has not been a single incident of anyone abusing this.”

概要：近期某蘇格蘭NGO組織寫信控訴「聯合國婦女受暴議題的特派員」對蘇格蘭self-id政策的批評，並宣稱這15年來沒有人濫用機制。

The Women’s Equality Party adopted a motion supporting the right of transgender people to self-determine their gender and to obtain gender-recognition certificates on that basis, while also reaffirming its support for single-sex services to be provided “as allowed by exemptions under the Equality Act, as long as they do so lawfully”

概要：婦女平等黨支持人們通過Self-ID獲得性別認同證書，同時重申：單一性別空間受平等法保障，只要那些空間合法就可以。

感覺是小歐盟最後的走向

唉，可惜台灣沒有平等法保障單一性別空間，連戶籍法都被解釋成沒有明定性別解釋了

In December 2022 the Scottish Court of Session declared that sex in the Equality Act means a person’s natal sex, unless they have a gender-recognition certificate.

2022年12月，蘇格蘭最高法院宣布平等法內的性別是基於出生性別（生理性別），除非已取得性別認同證明。

Biological males who have become “legally female” through the acquisition of a gender-recognition certificate (GRC) can still be excluded from a women-only service provided this is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.

生理男性可以被排除在純女性服務外，但前提是作為達成維護人權的合法目標手段。

In 2019 the Women’s Resource Centre published a report that highlighted a lack of confidence in using the Equality Act to provide single-sex services.

2019年的報告指出：大眾沒有信心提供平等法所保障的「單一性別服務」。

其實還提到滿多的，像是：
Vulnerable female survivors and prisoners self-identifying as men are having their identities unthinkingly confirmed by the institutions meant to be supporting them.

The ability to collect data is destroyed by a shift to asking questions only about identity, not sex, so services cannot be designed to meet needs.

The public-sector equality duty and standards that should protect women’s needs are being used to undermine them. Lack of clarity about the meaning of “woman” turns these instruments into weapons which attack rather than defend single-sex services for women.

裡面也提到「禁止談論」跟「跨性別女性就是女性觀念」就是跨運支持者想要產生的沉默螺旋效果

後面還有好多論點喔（生理電量耗盡），但大致上還是跨運搶奪婦運主導權，導致多數女性沉默且不再相信婦運組織提供的支持服務，同時跨運一再強迫女人必須提出「受暴證明」，才可能有資格獲得單一性別空間的使用權，跨運讓社會安全網優先考慮性別認同，而非長期受到性虐待或暴力對待的倖存者的感受，後續也距離某些NGO機構由跨性別主導之後，開始「再教育」女性的問題。

警方也開始依照犯罪者的性別認同辦事，特別是要求受害人依照「特定性別代名詞」稱呼犯人，這使受害者報案意願更低，因為這個舉動將使受害人不相信警政機關的公正性，這將使兒童性犯罪通報情況雪上加霜。

It is governors in the male estate saying, ‘We cannot guarantee your safety.’ It’s a supreme irony that, in the next breath, they say they will accommodate transwomen in female prisons with no regard to safety. They assume that women will be more understanding.”

「女性會同理，沒事啦」

Research indicates that young women who have experienced sexual violence are more likely to reject the label [of woman].
感覺可以搭配No Self-ID網站的新文章🤔

那些從電視上消失的女孩們 | No Self ID Taiwan 反對自我宣稱性別

看了一個小時還沒到全文的一半（救）
剩下的有緣再看

個人覺得這份或是類似的報告必須要在國家政策會議中被提出（做夢.jpg）

@BlackBottle - 「他是 ERCC(愛丁堡強暴危機中心) 的男性執行長 Mridul Wad...「沒有人濫用」只是神話。