July 02, 2008 at 17:33UnycornesaysYes, yes, and Ooops!
July 02, 2008 at 17:35dazzlindonnasaysyes, yes, and no. why? too lazy (er, can i call it "busy") to track the numbers.
July 02, 2008 at 17:38theGypsysaysanyone talk to bounce rates/engagement from Plurkers in comparison to say Twitter or Stumble?
July 02, 2008 at 17:38theGypsysaysbetter? worse? same?
July 02, 2008 at 17:40Eric Odomsaysdude... it's in the thousands
July 02, 2008 at 17:43MichDdotplurk has a much better time on site than twitter and stumble but i think its due to more direct person2person interest so they read more
July 02, 2008 at 17:44bethhartesaysI am a FeedBurner sped. I can't see any traffic. I don't think it set up right.