AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 12:25AM PLURKSHOP: Social Media dialogue across multiple channels: managing and learning from it. I'm kicking us off a bit early...
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 12:26AM For easiest following, open the Plurk Page link on the bottom right of this window, and open in a new tab
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 12:27AM Also a quick note: connie has smartly started us a Plurkshop account for easier hosting in future.
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 12:27AM To follow future plurkshops, be sure and follow "Plurkshops" timeline
Connie says Jun 30, 2008 12:28AM TIP: you may have to manually refresh this page if you're viewing in a separate tab. But it's much easier to keep up with this way.
seerysm says Jun 30, 2008 12:28AM smart! but it is sort of fun having someone host it each time. Sort of like a group taking turns meeting at each others houses
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 12:30AM Hi everyone! The url for tonight's plurkshop is www.plurk.com/p/v4rf
Connie says Jun 30, 2008 12:30AM seerysm We will still have someone different host it each time, but easier to have it in one location. We will give host the acct password.
Connie says Jun 30, 2008 12:30AM says We are also going to cross timezones and spread them out so our UK and Aussie friends (and others) can join more conveniently.
templestark says Jun 30, 2008 12:31AM dang seerysm has a good point too. Still there can always be one person to take hosting "duties."
servantofchaos says Jun 30, 2008 12:32AM Connie timezones are always tricky for me ... this works nicely!
Connie says Jun 30, 2008 12:32AM I think fragmentation is inevitable and we might as well embrace it. Community trumps control.
lizstrauss says Jun 30, 2008 12:32AM Hiya guys! MackCollier, It's hard to keep track . . . so much time just finding them.
servantofchaos says Jun 30, 2008 12:33AM I used to use CoComment to try and track my own comments, but it kept failing -- now I am out of the habit
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 12:33AM mackcollier don't be silly. Hijack away. I'm just the thread starter.
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 12:33AM i can see both sides....i want people to be able to leave feedback whereever they want
seerysm says Jun 30, 2008 12:33AM I used co.mment for awhile to try and aggregate some comment and discussion threads
Connie says Jun 30, 2008 12:33AM lizstrauss we have to keep developing and using new tools to track the conversation, but the genie is out of the bottle, in my opinion.
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 12:34AM but on flipside, fragmented feedback can lessen chances for a convo to develop if feedback was centralized
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 12:35AM for example, what if we all committed to blog about this topic today, instead of meet here? the fragmented feeback wont match convo here
servantofchaos says Jun 30, 2008 12:35AM TimJackson ... yes I rely on Google alerts and Technorati too ... but they dont keep all the threads together
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 12:35AM Hate to keep using Chris as an example, but he mentioned this yesterday on his blog.
Lux says Jun 30, 2008 12:35AM as someone with limited time and a LOT I need to follow, fragmentation increases the chance I miss something important.
MsHerr says Jun 30, 2008 12:35AM re: comments ... good to thread them w/ the content the refer to & comments are convo facilitators
seerysm says Jun 30, 2008 12:35AM I know rely on google alerts - but have found no real clean way to organize. But I want the interaction, no matter where it takes place
templestark says Jun 30, 2008 12:35AM always wanted software to track my comments everywhere. comment when something stirs ya or to help friends.
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 12:35AM Connie what do you think about the plugins that pull Friendfeed comments and put them back on your blog?
MsHerr says Jun 30, 2008 12:35AM and aggregation sometimesleads to disjointed or tangental convos that lose relevance to the initial content
lizstrauss says Jun 30, 2008 12:36AM connie I so agree that we never could control the conversation. Now it just feels like we're supposed to follow all of it.
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 12:36AM I think its a tradeoff, you want people to be able to have their say where THEY want, but fragmentation lessens chance for conversation
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 12:36AM ggroovin however you like! Feel free to read, listen, and jump in wherever.
Connie says Jun 30, 2008 12:36AM ggroovin Plurkshop is group chat about single topic. If you keep this convo open in separate tab, easier to follow. Chime in when ready.
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 12:37AM I use google alerts & technorati too and serph, which I just discovered
templestark says Jun 30, 2008 12:37AM tangents are death to many good conversations. so something like this with a frame of mind set at beginning seems useful
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 12:37AM spinopsys that's a great tool for Twitter, but what happens when comments start branching off to other sites?
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 12:37AM Mack- good point, but I really enjoy tracking people down and commenting in their turf. It feels natural.
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 12:37AM for example, one night Kr8tr posted a link to a blog post of his, asking for comments, Scoble told everyone instead to comment on it @FF
seerysm says Jun 30, 2008 12:38AM downside: Part of what's great about group convo is what's learned from each other - when convo happens in multiple places context gets lost
MsHerr thinks Jun 30, 2008 12:38AM the contextual linkage/fragmentation questions also raises the question about cross-posting
servantofchaos says Jun 30, 2008 12:38AM I did a search the other day on Addictomatic and found all these conversations ABOUT me that I was not part of!
Connie Jun 30, 2008 12:38AM following Mack's thought, then it helps to have something like this plurkshop where we have a central place for comments at least for a time
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 12:38AM Rob wanted the conversation on HIS blog, Scoble tried to 'hijack' it to Friendfeed
Te-ge says Jun 30, 2008 12:38AM one problem with blogs (and reason people are posting other places) comes down to who owns the comments...commenter or blogger?
LindaZ Jun 30, 2008 12:38AM I agree wit seerysm... better if it is all in one place but I understand that is not always possible
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 12:38AM Rob got mad cause Scoble was trying to move the conversation, but I could kinda see where Scoble had the right to try to have it on FF
templestark says Jun 30, 2008 12:39AM loves hash tags but keeps on forgetting to use them on Twitter.
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 12:39AM For example, I tracked down Spinospsys through Technorati and over the past 3+ years we've become friends as well.
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 12:39AM Gavin, that's exactly the hard part. Tracking down what's being said in an organized fashion and following up with all of it
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 12:39AM LindaZ, I don't know if surmize picks up plurks..I haven't seen any of mine over there anyway
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 12:39AM Prob is, what if someone is active on Friendfeed, and finds your blog post there, and doesnt read your blog, if they can comment there...
Te-ge Jun 30, 2008 12:39AM MackCollier that was the discussion that really hit on who owns the comment though...Socble asked Rob to remove his comments, Rob denied
seerysm says Jun 30, 2008 12:39AM over the last year, my interaction is more often on Twitter/Plurk - less on my blog - so those not there are left out of the discussions
servantofchaos says Jun 30, 2008 12:39AM Teeg you still dont really own the conversation even if it is on FF
Connie Jun 30, 2008 12:40AM Disagree w/ Scoble, agree w/ Mack & Tim - commenting on *their* turf is important. I love comments on my blog, even tho I enjoy this too.
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 12:40AM I prefer to comment where the conversation originates (or at least where I find it), but organizing them all is a bitch.
Lux says Jun 30, 2008 12:40AM I really do not care who "owns" the comments or the content, I just want to be able to find out wtf is going on.
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 12:40AM Connie maybe what we need to figure out is where ppl can most easily comment on our content, and encourage it there?
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 12:41AM Maybe its our blog, or could be here, or Twitter, or friendfeed
Te-ge says Jun 30, 2008 12:41AM you can actually delete your comments off FF though. Scoble had commented on the blog until he and Rob got upset with each other.
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 12:41AM blog comments are good...b/c then you can respond to a comment directly
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 12:41AM part of my "job" in building community is to go out into that community. Then they will come to my parties too.
Connie Jun 30, 2008 12:41AM plays devil's advocate. Who says we *have* to follow the conversation everywhere it goes? Especially since we don't "own" it?
servantofchaos says Jun 30, 2008 12:41AM comments without context are not all that valuable. That is where blogs are great
Te-ge is Jun 30, 2008 12:41AM trying Disqus right now, heard rumors it will interact with FF at some point. That would be nice.
Charlie asks Jun 30, 2008 12:42AM why people get worried about comment ownership? isn't that where "famous quotes" come from... what is said?
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 12:42AM AmberCadbra...I totally agree- prefer to comment at originating site
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 12:42AM I encourage peeps to comment on my blog because it's easier for me to keep in touch, but maybe that's selfish.
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 12:42AM Gavin I think blogs have 'deeper' comments, we have time to reflect and better form our thoughts
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 12:43AM I know that the time to do this is getting shorter w/ all the things on my plate, but the rewards have been many.
seerysm says Jun 30, 2008 12:43AM it is similar to what you have to consider to get conversions on your site, every click they have to make, the less likely they are going to
Te-ge says Jun 30, 2008 12:43AM it was already splintered. I'm much more likely to comment on SU than on someone's blog unless I know them anyway.
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 12:43AM Let me ask a tangential question. If you're a company and you're trying to do rep management, what's the best way to listen ?
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 12:43AM AmberCadabra, I don't think it's selfish, it makes sense...I like it when there are mult. streams of dialog, but "beef" of disc. is @ blog
seerysm says Jun 30, 2008 12:43AM if someone has a thought about ur blog post I want them to easily be able to do that where they want at their convenience - it is up to them
Lux says Jun 30, 2008 12:44AM Tim, yes, me too. I need to stay involved & gain trust. I can't do that if I can't find the party.
AzWebDude is Jun 30, 2008 12:44AM ok so someone explain PLurk..how this works btw MsHerr sent me here
templestark says Jun 30, 2008 12:44AM likes comments at his blog(s) because then I havebetter hope the context is correct.
servantofchaos asks Jun 30, 2008 12:44AM is all this conversation pointless without a destination? If we are engaging with conversation, is there is an objective other than buzz?
Connie Jun 30, 2008 12:44AM AmberCadabra reputation monitoring: develop so many Google alerts that you finally give up & use a company like Radian6 (lebrun here).
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 12:44AM I am in favor of the conversation staying in one spot, but let's face it- isn't going to. Again, this goes back to the notion of control.
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 12:44AM AzWebDude why dont you ask that question in a different thread?
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 12:45AM templestark....hopefully though, when ppl post link to blog, it gets followed b4 commenting @ 2ndary site begins...kinda like "RTFA" ?
Te-ge Jun 30, 2008 12:45AM wonders if FF just brought it out in the open that the conversation ISN'T at one spot? It actually hasn't been for years.
MsHerr says Jun 30, 2008 12:45AM timjackson raises a good point about reciprocity. if we want others to play w/ us, we need play w/ them too. but it needs to be authentic.
ggroovin says Jun 30, 2008 12:46AM tho I'm not a blogger, I do think if I were & comments to my original thots weren't left on my blog I might have one less reason to continue
seerysm says Jun 30, 2008 12:46AM we can't control readers, and they want content portability, even the comment content - they want to read and respond where/when they want
Connie Jun 30, 2008 12:46AM AzWebDude Easiest if you open this conversation in a separate tab so it scrolls vertically. www.plurk.com/p/v4rf
ggroovin says Jun 30, 2008 12:46AM if someone wants to take my thots & start a conversation elsewhere, as long as I get credit & a reference that'd be OK.
nwjerseyliz is Jun 30, 2008 12:47AM finding that there are more comments than she can read, constantly refreshing and playing catch-up
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 12:47AM Amber, I try to listen every way I can. Google searches, Technorati, etc. I try it all. It is not efficient, but I don't think it will be.
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 12:47AM Teeg that's true, I know some bloggers that will email me to thank me for commenting on their blog, but then convo builds via email not blog
Te-ge says Jun 30, 2008 12:47AM as bloggers, it's our business to find the feeds...our customers have no reason to keep everything in front of us.
LindaZ Jun 30, 2008 12:47AM comment on blogs is the best, the person gets to really share what they think, feel and want to tell U plus they have more than 140character
JenniferLaycock is Jun 30, 2008 12:47AM You know, from a search optimization perspective, I like the convo in multiple places, as long as they link
Connie says Jun 30, 2008 12:47AM Teeg makes a good point. FF just highlighted the fact that the conversation was already fragmented.
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 12:47AM I do believe we have to go where the comments are- as a company. If I find a new blog comment or convo, I go visit and comment back.
JenniferLaycock is Jun 30, 2008 12:48AM Also, with the convo in multiple places, more people have a chance to join in.
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 12:48AM it's too bad you can't ping back comments regardless of where they happen
Te-ge has Jun 30, 2008 12:48AM been using SU for 3 years and before that other social sites. Conversations about blogs were always on the other sites...
codyrobert says Jun 30, 2008 12:48AM it's nicer to respond to a comment when it's somewhere you know it'll be, ie, on your blog. rather than off somewhere you mightn't look
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 12:48AM Jennifer try, but fragmented means it could be harder to grow into robust convo at one place, like blog
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 12:48AM If I find a new blog or comment, I try to go there and comment back. Even if weeks later. That has really helped me w/ outreach.
JenniferLaycock is Jun 30, 2008 12:48AM There are only positives to more people in the convo. I say spread it everywhere! Just learn to track.
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 12:49AM I've got a core of really good "fans" in Minneapolis because I tracked back one comment on one blog. Now I have a great group of many blogs.
JenniferLaycock is Jun 30, 2008 12:49AM Mack, sure, harder to have robust conversation, but easier to have convo go in different directions...
DebInAustin says Jun 30, 2008 12:49AM hi gang. Dog trainer stayed forever! So I m am just hopping on.
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 12:49AM jenniferlaycock that's a great point abt reaching a larger audience and engaging more people
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 12:49AM true, i am really playing devil's advocate, cause I can see both sides on this one
Connie says Jun 30, 2008 12:49AM Gavin and Tim are speaking as company reps looking for the conversation, as is Rachel.
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 12:50AM Rachel- I'm gonna admit that I have no idea what it is. I'm still a techno-doofus.
JenniferLaycock is Jun 30, 2008 12:50AM A lot of times, different blogs or communities view witha different spin, which adds even more value to convo
servantofchaos says Jun 30, 2008 12:50AM I guess it all depends on your strategy -- what is the conversation and where are you trying to drive it to?
Connie Jun 30, 2008 12:50AM Others see this from a blogger's perspective; Jennifer brings a search guru's perspective. That's what makes this great.
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 12:50AM Tim that's great, see so many companies dont think to do that, follow the comments back
JenniferLaycock is Jun 30, 2008 12:50AM Thanks Amber. I mean isn't fragmentation the very definition of "loss of control" and isn't this what happens with Social Media?
servantofchaos says Jun 30, 2008 12:51AM of course, as a blogger I just want to know what people are saying about me
templestark says Jun 30, 2008 12:51AM ggroovin is going oto motivation for social media. since I'm new(ish) I'm curious. There's a lot of mixed motivations.
Te-ge says Jun 30, 2008 12:51AM I know that until I blogged myself, I hated posting to blogs...it was much easier posting somewhere that my friends were and would talk
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 12:52AM Connie, both need to enter the picture. I mean social media and search are tied, whether social types like it. Have to play both strengths
seerysm says Jun 30, 2008 12:52AM some combo of a convo tag along w/ RSS would work so all posts/responses get a tag where ever they happen & there's a feed for that tag
Connie Jun 30, 2008 12:52AM Jennifer, agreed. Bottom line: there is not control. Impossible to get control (at this point). So what do you do about it?
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 12:52AM Had to refresh screen. Ugh. I do the same as TimJackson re: responding to comments, regardless of age for both biz & personal blogs
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 12:52AM Jennifer... I could kiss you for that comment; fragmentation, though inconvenient, spreads the conversation around to other channels.
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 12:52AM Connie what does Radian 6 give you that you can't get from monitoring via Google Blog Search/Summize/Technorati?
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 12:52AM Mack, I think search is a key point many social/blog types miss. Those links are gold to you, especially if in editorial and not comments
codyrobert says Jun 30, 2008 12:52AM comment pingbacks are a good compromise. still allowing user control of the conversation while relaying that info back to the blog
Lux says Jun 30, 2008 12:52AM Connie they sound interesting, just not sure I'll have budget for their service.
templestark says Jun 30, 2008 12:53AM I'm all right with loss of control but what is it being controlled or uncontrolled? (Thinks of William S. Burroughs quote here)
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 12:53AM The more people who make the convo their own on their own blog, the more it boosts you. That's a good thing, if you can track
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 12:53AM I think you have to give up the idea of having "total" control and find the greatest common denominator
Connie Jun 30, 2008 12:53AM can already see that we're going to draft Jennifer to host a plurkshop on social media and natural search.
tdhurst asks Jun 30, 2008 12:53AM Okay, where's the cake I'm supposed to jump out of? I'm already in costume.
servantofchaos says Jun 30, 2008 12:53AM I'm with you Connie, before social media we had the illusion of control. Now the conversation is audible thanks to our "digital ears"
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 12:53AM Jennifer it seems there's a lot of SM types misunderstanding Search, and vice versa
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 12:54AM Connie, I'd love to hear more about them too, though my crowd likes the cheap stuff.
seerysm has Jun 30, 2008 12:54AM attended a Radian6 demo and liked it very much - but what you get out is still only as good as your search terms
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 12:54AM I don't want to quash the conversation at all, I just want a better way to keep up with it.
Connie Jun 30, 2008 12:54AM Codyrobert, please explain more. Not sure I follow about comment pingback.
templestark says Jun 30, 2008 12:54AM For instance, this convo is hard to follow but we all get something out of it - but almost certainly something different with each of us.
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 12:54AM Teeg I think if you empower your readers, it makes them more likely to comment and return regularly
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 12:54AM Spinopsys- excellent point. Again, we already know we've lost control and running around is difficult, but the doors that open are great.
servantofchaos says Jun 30, 2008 12:54AM Spinopsys ... oh, another good topic. Anyone else live in fear of the "semantic web"
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 12:54AM LOL sure Connie. And I promise the topic woudln't be "game digg and fake friends for more links"
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 12:55AM How many of you are regularly checking your logs for new referrers? Not top/popular, but new?
Te-ge says Jun 30, 2008 12:55AM there has always been social media to an extent though, whether it was a chat room or online game. SM just expanded these.
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 12:55AM Gavin- can you stop w/ the awesome quotes. You're making me feel like an idiot.
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 12:55AM Whether comments are nofollowed or not, they still often send traffic, helping you track them.
Connie Jun 30, 2008 12:55AM Jennifer, I like the cheap stuff too, and most of us *have* to use free/cheap stuff. But there is a place for cos. like Radian6.
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 12:56AM LOL JenniferLaycock I'd settle for "How not to be a search dumbass"
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 12:56AM servantofchaos oh my, no, embrace the semantic web! It will rock. Let us get back to natural language and not keywords
codyrobert Jun 30, 2008 12:56AM connie for example a comment posted on stumbleupon, would ping the blog so the writer could see where the conversation is and respond
servantofchaos says Jun 30, 2008 12:56AM I think brands and bloggers (in general) have similar objectives -- to build community. Smart brands, that is.
ggroovin asks Jun 30, 2008 12:56AM what is the motivation for those of you who blog? How's hearing feedback on your own blog feel compared to feedback stumbled upon elsewhere?
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 12:57AM AzWeb if you follow Amber, you can watch ir from the timeline where it updates automatically
Te-ge says Jun 30, 2008 12:57AM MackCollier I'm an introvert, sounds silly, but I HATE posting where I don't know what reaction I'll get. SM gives instant reactions
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 12:57AM AmberCadabra we'll so get that taken care of for you, I promise.
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 12:57AM Teeg, like MackCollier said, too let them know you want to hear from them...their thoughts/opinions..even to the shy it says "hey, your ...
templestark says Jun 30, 2008 12:57AM i can never find the link on stumbleupon when i click the referral link. It's buried somewhere but it's nice to see.
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 12:58AM Teeg I am introvert too! Have blogged about how SM makes us introverts more extroverted!
Te-ge says Jun 30, 2008 12:58AM blogs often give delayed reactions and I used to fret until I heard something. Many of my readers are the same, hate posting on blogs
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 12:58AM Mack, I know you do, but you are rare. Very few people actually check those log files.
AzWebDude is Jun 30, 2008 12:58AM building communities may be the ONLY thing some of these guys are building
Te-ge Jun 30, 2008 12:58AM I know because we've discussed sites that are introvert friendly on there.
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 12:58AM Jennifer I watch SiteMeter to see where I am getting referrals too, like if I see a sudden spike in traffic, probably from new link
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 12:59AM ggrovin' for me, its sharing, discussing, informing some combo of all three
servantofchaos says Jun 30, 2008 12:59AM blog commenting feels more permanent. Plurk and Twitter feels more transient. There seems to be more WEIGHT to blog comments
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 12:59AM JenniferLaycock I just started tracking site visits and such with FeedBurner and it's really helping me understand where my traffic is from
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:00AM REMINDER: If you have this conversation open in a separate tab so that it scrolls vertically you have to manually refresh if not commenting.
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:00AM Mack, that's where I like ClickTracks. They have an awesome "what's changed" feature that picks up the slightest new source.
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 01:00AM Rachel and Teeg, thats why I think we need to do everything we can to make readers feel comfortable commenting
Te-ge says Jun 30, 2008 01:00AM I check my log files...I love visiting blogs that comment about me, but have to get better at commenting on their sites.
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 01:00AM I would like an aggregator that searched channels to show me convos, but I don't know how that would ever happen.
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:00AM Amber we'll have to help you get on something meatier. Even Google Analytics is a good start, tis free
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 01:00AM I find that as a commenter, I leave comments on blogs because I want the writer to know i was listening.
DebInAustin says Jun 30, 2008 01:00AM AmberCadabra have you tried SiteMeter too? It's more comprehensive than Feedb and finds hits that FB doesn't
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 01:01AM For now, Google Alerts works well enough. It's time consuming, yes, but I think a lot of folks appreciate that I have to take the time.
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:01AM Mack, no, but they have hosted versions that start around $50/mo Doable for biz.
Te-ge was Jun 30, 2008 01:01AM surprised at the number of readers who responded when she posted about introverts. Think many are afraid other times.
Connie says Jun 30, 2008 01:01AM ggroovin had a good point I wanted to comment on but we're going so fast I can't scroll back that far & find it.
templestark says Jun 30, 2008 01:01AM my BASE motivation is I like readers. I like to share and know things I say engage. Many, too have ads on their sites.
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 01:01AM ok sbmu I need to do a trade with someone, I'll help them with their blog if you guys will SEO mine
servantofchaos says Jun 30, 2008 01:01AM I have used PageFlakes to setup a listening post before ... works well with a heap of different feed categories etc
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 01:01AM if I post to Plurk or Twitter, it's secondary because I know the chances of someone hearing me amongst the noise are small
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 01:01AM JenniferLaycock I plan on picking your brain plenty, don't you worry
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:01AM You know, Google is starting to index Tweets. If they'd keep it up with SM, we could track everything with alerts
Te-ge Jun 30, 2008 01:02AM laughs...I actually post to plurk first, and usually get a LOT of reaction
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 01:02AM AmberCadabra at least here though, the chances of getting clicks/convo are greater than @ Twitter, where maybe 1 or 2 followers might click
Te-ge says Jun 30, 2008 01:02AM that's part of the reason I'm disappointed at the reception Plurk has gotten most places so far
Lux says Jun 30, 2008 01:03AM only problem with Google Alerts is that my mailbox is exploding already
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:03AM We need to collaborate on a group post on our favorite tracking services. What's the equivilant of Summize etc
Beth Harte says Jun 30, 2008 01:03AM it was brought up last night about following mult. threads for mult. products (B2B) I would think that mean an SM staff to monitor and man.
servantofchaos says Jun 30, 2008 01:03AM Connie ... but building community can turn into something longer term. You might build that around your blog - and find opportinities later
codyrobert says Jun 30, 2008 01:03AM twitter really is just a bunch of noise where as like plurk you can really converse and expect responses from others
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 01:03AM I think Plurk users are more engaged, smaller userbase where we are more likely to know peopel we follow
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:03AM Rachel you can setup Google Alerts as a feed to scan when you wish to...
Te-ge Jun 30, 2008 01:04AM ex: I got 340 visits to my post last thursday in 2 hours, by only posting on here, then went to do broadcast
DebInAustin says Jun 30, 2008 01:04AM emsgeiss I am with you. I put stuff out on Twitter and rarely get anything back. With the Plurk convos I get ideas, feedback, etc
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 01:04AM What I have experienced is that the fact I spend too much time online searching on my brand, has given me more "cred" w/ the readers/commty
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 01:04AM I'm also not very good at building GOOD google Alerts, which is another problem LOL
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:04AM Mack, you are right. Plurk users are early adopters. It's a different crowd than even the early adopters of Twitter
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 01:04AM JenniferLaycock I think you just volunteered the topic for your Plurkshop.
seerysm wishes Jun 30, 2008 01:05AM ChrisBrogan would jump into the discussion - www.plurk.com/p/v5ey you here and just lurking Chris?
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:05AM Amber makes a good point. If you don't understand search, how do you setup accurate Alerts?
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 01:05AM Rachel...same here...make a sep folder for the alerts if you have gmail
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:06AM How much convo are you missing because you don't know what all to search for
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 01:06AM AzWebDude, Sitemeter is free way to track your blog/site traffic
seerysm says Jun 30, 2008 01:06AM the point about Plurk users being a highly engaged user base is a good one. Even my mom's biz site/blog has seen a traffic jump from Plurk!
AzWebDude is Jun 30, 2008 01:06AM yeah 1st time on this.. its flying.. hard to see who responds to what/whom
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:06AM Clicktracks is now sold by Lyris. Check out www.lyris.com shoudl be there
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 01:06AM Rachel, that's what I do, then a couple of times a day go through the new ones, ones...it helps keep the "inbox noise" down
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 01:06AM crap this plurkshop on fragmented conversations is getting fragmented!
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:07AM Over 300 now. This is most people we have had on at one time, so it really is flying tonight.
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:07AM Plurk does not represent your average web user (neither does Twitter) so you can't extend trends to overall web usage
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 01:07AM would love to see a Plurkshop on listening tools: Google Alerts and all these other yummy things
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:07AM Also, you can send your Google Alerts to a separate mailbox or filter them and check when you have time.
templestark says Jun 30, 2008 01:07AM teeg offers that we should participate more - but with a choking amount of new SM tools, that seems LESS likely, doesn't it?
seerysm says Jun 30, 2008 01:07AM have google alerts for my name & seerysm; my blog URL & blog name as well as all topics I'm focused on such as "corporate career websites"
DebInAustin says Jun 30, 2008 01:08AM I am with JenniferLaycock We all are really into learning the newest stuff which puts us in a tough spot when trying to convey Plurk
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:08AM agrees w/ Jennifer about Twitter/Plurk being FAR from the average web user. And we need to keep that in mind when seeking comments.
Te-ge Jun 30, 2008 01:08AM wonders if we should make a plurk of everyone's strengths and let each person lead a plurkshop on their area?
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:08AM Is anyone actively encouraging people to take the convo to their own community/blog for their own spin?
servantofchaos says Jun 30, 2008 01:08AM bethharte I use it as a listening post. I setup multiple RSS feeds linked to key topics. Each displays in its own window on a tabbed page
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 01:08AM I have found great value in Statcounter too. I trackback a lot of visitors that way and seen may things Technorati doesn't always catch.
Lux says Jun 30, 2008 01:09AM as much as I like Plurk, I can't help but think that this would be easier in an old school chat room.
mleis asks Jun 30, 2008 01:09AM jenniferlaycock are you really ever missing it, or is that just perceived because of lack of good mechanisms to know ur audience?
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 01:09AM Connie Bensen asked for def of Community, right before this starts, think s that would be great plurkshop
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:09AM I think it's easy for us to get caught up in how we communicate and expect the world to follow. They will, but not soon.
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 01:09AM JenniferLaycock that's a great point about the "average" user. We all need to remember that not everyone is as imbedded as we are
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 01:09AM seerysm...I do the keywords too for me/my company...that way I can see where if there were typos or whatever we come up anyway
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:09AM Teeg, will send you separate plurk about ways we are looking to implement your idea about different hosts, etc.
Te-ge Jun 30, 2008 01:09AM agrees with Rachel. Having to refresh causes major delays with this many people
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 01:10AM when I launched my mag, there were posts about it @ various places and I was able to go to their blog and thank them for the mention, so
DebInAustin says Jun 30, 2008 01:10AM I have set up tracking for my blog with at least 6 different apps and cross reference b/c they all miss something others find
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 01:10AM I added LiJit search widget, it's reporting slight;y more traffic than sitemeter, I think
Connie says Jun 30, 2008 01:10AM sdavis, Welcome. Rachel, we might want to try a plurkshop using CoverItLive hosted on a blog.
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 01:10AM for me the google alerts are a must-have for the keywords not just my name/handle/biz.
servantofchaos says Jun 30, 2008 01:10AM has anyone tried addictomatic? I keep finding interesting references there that have otherwise gone unnoticed
Te-ge Jun 30, 2008 01:10AM would love to see more of the SEO guys come to these too, she knows several who haven't been and would have good input
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:10AM Remember guys, don't just have alerts for YOUR name/biz. Follow your competitors too, or even friends. The convo is all tied together
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:11AM Siegelo, Welcome. It is kind of overwhelming tonight. I'm sure I will go back and reread this thread later.
emsgeiss asks Jun 30, 2008 01:11AM JenniferLaycock..how do yo mean spin? I posted a poll about SM use and WAHMs on Sat. at the mag's blog if that's what you mean
seerysm says Jun 30, 2008 01:11AM tip for alerts enter ur “blog topic related words" at Google Suggest - www.google.com/webhp?complete=1&hl=en and see what’s most commonly searched
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:11AM Just depends on which SEO types you get. Some only value SM for the access to quick/easy links.
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 01:11AM agrees with all of you that this format will take some tweaking, but hang in there!
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:11AM It's why I call myself a "recovering SEO" I don't like being lumped in with gamers
emsgeiss asks Jun 30, 2008 01:12AM or do you mean for them to branch off at their relative blogs etc...when that happens naturally, I love it.
Te-ge Jun 30, 2008 01:12AM laughs I started out in chat rooms and games. That taught me the power of social media before most places were realizing it.
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 01:12AM Jennifer- excellent point; I have done that as well. If I want to know what is being said about a competitor, I create a Google alert.
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 01:13AM in hindsight, inviting Plurk newbies to come HERE might not have been best ider ever
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 01:13AM Jennifer- excellent point; I have done that as well. If I want to know what is being said about a competitor, I create a Google alert.
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:13AM emsgeiss I mean encouraging them to make a post on their site with their own perspective.
Connie asks Jun 30, 2008 01:13AM templestark Would CoverItLive be able to keep up with conversation this fast?
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:13AM I.E. Do you invite folks to go in-depth on their blog, then comment on yours with summary and link to their own blog/full post
seerysm says Jun 30, 2008 01:14AM alerts.yahoo.com or google.com/alerts; enter search query that you want to be “alerted” about, specify alert frequency; Enter your email
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 01:14AM Sometimes I set one up for just a given product. Helps me see potential issues w/ my own- by reading theirs.
Connie says Jun 30, 2008 01:14AM Mack, yeah, we should have invited noobies to the Plurk101 plurkshop. Our bad.
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:14AM Connie, only hat I ever wear is as cowboy hat. It's brown. There are no hats, only risks/ethics
LindaZ Jun 30, 2008 01:14AM THX jennifer... have google alerts for my company, name and my specialty, never thought of competitors... that will keep me on my toes
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 01:14AM JenniferLaycock...I haven't yet, but folks at the writer's forum (AW) do w/blog carnival
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:15AM Exactly, track comments on words indirectly related to you. Caribou tracked Starbucks and capitalized with SB screwed up
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:15AM Spinopsys thanks for info. Have not hosted w/ CoverItLive but attended live event -- birth of a Twitter friend's daughter. It was moving.
DebInAustin says Jun 30, 2008 01:15AM I use google alerts for my political PR work- every key word related to my person/issue possible. It's a lot, but helps me keep up
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 01:15AM Jennifer- another great point. I don't directly ask them to have conversations on their own sites, but I encourage it by participating there
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:15AM emsgeiss oh, great point. Blog Carnivals are an excellent example of just that. Encourage bloggers to take it home and make it their own.
LindaZ Jun 30, 2008 01:15AM Plurk newbies will read and lurk and may learn how we play on plurk... then they will come and participate with us
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:16AM templestark not to exclude newbies, just meaning that this is happening so fast they might be overwhelmed by conversation & not participate
Te-ge Jun 30, 2008 01:16AM LSFloyd we had 2 threads going last night and was really impossible to keep up.
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:16AM emsgeiss Yep, used to do a breastfeeding carnival with The Lactivist. They work great at spreading convo around
DebInAustin says Jun 30, 2008 01:16AM when doing a blog carnival research for quality, I did one, then regretted it when I saw who I was lumped in with.
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:16AM Tim, but what about actively encouraging it...having a tag at the end of each post welcoming them to do so? Value in that?
Connie says Jun 30, 2008 01:17AM I'm a Plurk pro and can't keep up with you young'uns tonight. www.sucomments.com/wp-content/Images/skype%20emoticons/pinkboasmall.gif
LindaZ Jun 30, 2008 01:17AM We could have a plurkshop to teach newbies how to plurk on plurk and all the ways to work the timeline... they keep getting overwhelmed
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 01:17AM templeshark Plurk has a STEEP learning curve, just dont want to scare any newbies off with how fast this thread is moving
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:17AM Connie, They're great, with the right crowd. As Deb says, you have to ersearch it. 5 of us ran one, invited guest entries. Worked great!
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 01:17AM JenniferLaycock. ... if I had MackCollier's smileys, I do the bowing one too, to you.
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 01:18AM Connie notice the one that didn't like Plurk has come in and taken over?!?
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:18AM Teeg, sure, it's crazy easy. Happy to help with that if anyone wants. Done them for more than a year.
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 01:19AM Jennifer- yes, total value in that. Another thing I have done before is grab a quote, w/ link from another blog & post on mine.
seerysm says Jun 30, 2008 01:19AM Video responses on sites like seesmic present an interesting challenge - that content isn't indexable by search engines (yet)
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 01:19AM DebInDenver...yes quality is key...and you don't want what one blogger recently called blog comment pu$$ies LOL
mleis Jun 30, 2008 01:19AM A blog carnival with it's own widget to show the other posts/responses. That would be neat
AmberCadabra says Jun 30, 2008 01:19AM if we keep getting this kind of Plurkshop interest, we'll def need to consider forum options
Te-ge Jun 30, 2008 01:19AM jenniferlaycock I think a plurk carnival would be neat! Not sure i have the time to set it up, but would gladly help someone else
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 01:19AM Bringing the conversation back to my house, but encouraging folks to visit the source.
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:19AM It's all in the format. I LOVE this kind of talk and I don't get it much with "my" crowd. SEOs...
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:20AM Teeg, I think doing our own social media blog carnival would be a good idea.
templestark says Jun 30, 2008 01:20AM just what connie says - the "non-newbies" seem overwhelmed too. i just called this wading in shallow pool - right before waterfall
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:20AM Connie, nope. Could never use it "straight" but in this conversation style, it rocks.
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 01:20AM I think that is a nice compromise. People can comment on my site or follow the link back to the originator.
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:20AM Tim, exactly! Experienced bloggers do that all the time, but a lot of folks auto comment, don't think to "bring it home."
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 01:20AM would be happy to dedicate some time to helping with a blog carnival even tho i'm clueless LOL
LindaZ Jun 30, 2008 01:20AM I will play with you all on the plurk 101 and invite all my lagard tweeples
Beth Harte says Jun 30, 2008 01:21AM A thought...SM experts for specific prod. lines/srvcs. to manage convos w/customers and to 'listen' for new prod. enhancements. My utopia
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:21AM LOL...No, it means they're...let's not go there. They'll kick me out.
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:21AM Tim, but you know, people "remember" when we remind them. Maybe we shoudl be PUSHING fragmentation ourselves? Embrace and spread it
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:22AM seerysm, have you checked out viewzi.com -- beginning to do video search.
JenniferLaycock thinks Jun 30, 2008 01:22AM she's being an awful mom leaving her kid up because she doesn't awnt to miss any convo here
Te-ge is Jun 30, 2008 01:22AM getting excited about this...a carnival and plurkshop will also put plurk out there more, and give it more "credit"
templestark says Jun 30, 2008 01:22AM RE seerysm - Video as biz tools/ means to an end, is overrated, I believe but am often wrong.
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 01:23AM cripes, get up to pee and have to scroll back a mile LOL. I LOVE it!
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 01:23AM TimJackson when you say the source, you mean the source of where they saw the orig. post or link or whatev?
JenniferLaycock thinks Jun 30, 2008 01:23AM Beth ditto...I see the frustration, but again, my SEO mind says "spread it! spread it far and wide!!" Then worry about tracking
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 01:23AM Phil- Thanks brother. Jennifer- I agree that seeking that wider convo is wonderful. I comment all over the map seeking ways to do that.
templestark says Jun 30, 2008 01:23AM I've fanned a few here, I am fascinated and want to subscribe to your newsletter.
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 01:23AM JenniferLaycock...I sent min on pre-bed walk with Daddy LOL, sun finally went down here
DebInAustin says Jun 30, 2008 01:23AM AmberCadabra I hear You! I haven't had dinner yet and it's killing me, but I know if I leave...
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 01:24AM It's not easy to go back and find them all, but they take the time to find me- it's the least I can do.
JenniferLaycock thinks Jun 30, 2008 01:24AM she's going to have to test out this "pushing fragmentation" thing on her blog...this is worth testing.
DebInAustin says Jun 30, 2008 01:24AM bethharte a group of blogers post around a similar topic hosted by one blogger- a carnival of posts
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 01:24AM My goal all along has been to create a person for people to relate to- that's me. If they relate to me, then by extension maybe the brand.
seerysm says Jun 30, 2008 01:25AM I think webcasts/ conferences that are available in video formats like what you find on Ustream have a ton of potential for business
JenniferLaycock thinks Jun 30, 2008 01:25AM Blog Carnival: One topic, bunch of bloggers post on same day, all link to each other's perspectives. Great link/traffic/convo driver
Connie says Jun 30, 2008 01:25AM The longer these get, the more we need someone to recap them the next day, like Amber did before.
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 01:25AM TimJackson, I think that's exactly what Mack was getting at in his post @ Viral Garden
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 01:26AM Connie I have almost given up, gonna have to read thread again tomorrow
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 01:26AM JenniferLaycock agree with you. Worth testing. I plan to post about it and test it, even with my lil' readership LOL
Beth Harte says Jun 30, 2008 01:26AM fragmentation makes sense to me b'cause that's human nature, people skip around.
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:26AM Yep, would love to see a recap of this. Hard to follow, even as a fast reader
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 01:26AM Connie...we'll need a recap and a kind of defragging the convo. LOL
Te-ge has Jun 30, 2008 01:26AM a list of many of the bloggers from her friends list and what they blog about...would that help with the carnival?
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:27AM Know what? Would love to have this conversation as a virtual panel -- webinar, Second Life, something. Fantastic conversation!
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:27AM Amber, I think several of us should all try it. Track average number of inbound links to each post before and after. I'm up for it.
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 01:27AM Erika- yes, exactly. I find something and then I encourage folks to visit that space when I mention it. I like to "share the wealth".
Lux says Jun 30, 2008 01:27AM Tim -- that doesn't scale well, there's no one person who can represent ALL of the brands at my co.
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 01:27AM I'm happy to keep summarizing our plurkshops but we need to get the site set up so I can do it there.
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:28AM I think we have fragmented our own conversation/plurkshop, simply because of information overload. My Mighty Brain is aching.
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:28AM Nice job Amber,this convo is enough to bring me back for future Plurkshops, even if I hate "standard" Plurk
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 01:28AM Connie...we'd need a pretty big webinar/conf room though, wouldn't you think?
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:28AM Teeg, I think to start out we should limit it to people participating here, kind of a pre-screening for quality/topic.
Te-ge thinks Jun 30, 2008 01:28AM fragmenting like this is good though...we can always come back to the other topics to add more depth
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 01:29AM connie i was reading your mind. need to limit some participation to start with and get a handle on things
Beth Harte says Jun 30, 2008 01:29AM Folks, need to pack it in. Will read this tomorrow. ambercadabera, thanks for kicking this off! Again, learned a ton of new apps.
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:29AM Amber, let's work on the site this week. Have it up before next plurkshop. We'll transfer your recaps to the new site.
bigepaz says Jun 30, 2008 01:29AM I'm learning a lot just by lurking. but excluding us newbies sounds disingenuous
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 01:29AM Tim that's my thought too..it's about sharing, connecting...but then, I'm the "hippie mama" amongst my friends lol
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:30AM Erika, yes would need big room but know places/companies that do that. Maybe they could host?
AzWebDude is Jun 30, 2008 01:30AM still rather lost on Plurk, telling me to go to another thread?? what threads.. BUT greta chat and lots of new apps..
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 01:30AM pchaney reserved the plurkshops domain, so that would be the place to summarize these. My blog might not be the right vehicle
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:30AM I don't like the idea of excluding folks either...surely there's a platform that can handle it all.
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 01:30AM bigepaz I don't think the intent was to exclude newbies...just make one that might not be as intimidating esp. if one is shy/introverted
Beth Harte says Jun 30, 2008 01:30AM even though it's tough to keep up, and I'd hate for folks to be excluded, I think it needs to be that way...at least to test it out.
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 01:30AM Rachel- I agree, it's harder when you have multiple products. You need brand champions. That's really my job (among other things).
AzWebDude feels Jun 30, 2008 01:31AM as far as new readers or control of content.. new/good content keeps readers coming back and new ones joining
servantofchaos says Jun 30, 2008 01:31AM Connie ... SL might be the best way to do this ... but does it capture the threads?
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:31AM Amber, but summarize there and invite everyone else to link to summary with their own blog post/take on the convo.
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:31AM That will build up links to the new site, index it faster, get you ranking for hot topics of discussion
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:31AM One hour and over 500 comments. Will really enjoy rereading this tomorrow.
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 01:31AM bigepaz no intention of excluding newbies at all, just asking them to sign up is all
Beth Harte says Jun 30, 2008 01:31AM theGypsy is going to try cliques for daily SEO Plurkshops...we'll see how that works out.
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 01:32AM and it's a platform w/a whiteboard & Web interface as well as chat/sound I just presented at a conf. on ivocalize earlier this month
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:32AM Connie, surely with this crowd we can find a company to sponsor? Then RSVP up to a certain audience size. First come, first serve
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:32AM bigepaz Welcome! We do not want to exclude anyone. We just thought that this might have been overwhelming to someone new to Plurk.
AzWebDude thinks Jun 30, 2008 01:33AM amberCadabra should post that at the top.. I think I am signed up but not sure
theGypsy says Jun 30, 2008 01:34AM too much fragmentation isn't great IMO.... since I was tasked earlier to do some SEO PlurkShops this thread is quite educational....
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:34AM Gavin, I think you can do that in SL. Question there is whether you do voice or text.
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 01:34AM bethharte (hi!) I'm still figuring out how to do / sign up for cliques
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 01:34AM Connie I'm already thinking about how many blog posts I could get from this
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:34AM Jennifer, I think you're right and I have contacts at a couple of companies. Will check with them about hosting.
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 01:34AM AzWebDude sorry missed you - post what at the top? If you mean the plurkshops.com site, it's not up yet.
theGypsy says Jun 30, 2008 01:35AM one needs multiple threads IMO and I am also having peeps *sign up* so I can use cliques for them... makes it easier to find them later
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 01:35AM also thinking how a company could do this internally with a clique of just their employees, have a 'brainstorming' session on a set topic
acnatta thinks Jun 30, 2008 01:35AM cliques are a great idea - the cool thing about the plurkshops were having convos in small groups
bigepaz says Jun 30, 2008 01:35AM Connie - thanks. for me the topic was more overwhelming than the speed of the plurks. I for one get more replies on plurk than blogs
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:35AM Erika, you can't join a clique. Name is misleading. It's really just a group mailing list created by individual plurker.
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 01:36AM connie let me know if you need a hand organizing. i'm not as up with the tools, but can help coordinate if you need me.
theGypsy says Jun 30, 2008 01:36AM for the life of me can't see a dedicated convo on social media... this one seems to drift... thus specific threads for centric convos
bigepaz loves Jun 30, 2008 01:36AM the idea of Plurkshops, no matter how overwhelming it gets. thanks everyone!
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:37AM bigepaz The topic is HUGE. Bet we could do a whole series of these and not cover the topic. Glad you joined us.
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 01:37AM i created a plurkshoppers clique but quickly realized that i was bound to omit people unwillingly
LindaZ Jun 30, 2008 01:37AM night to all really enjoyed reading your plurks learned a lot, please let us at least lurk
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:37AM Amber, I will definitely need help organizing it. Limited time, but have some good contacts and ideas. Let's do it!
ckeithley says Jun 30, 2008 01:38AM I wish I hadn't joined the party late. But, I finally joined Plurk, which is something.
Te-ge thinks Jun 30, 2008 01:38AM when you get several people talking about anything, the subject tends to drift naturally unless 1 person keeps everyone on subject
AzWebDude feels Jun 30, 2008 01:38AM amberCadabra that they should sign up.. its ok...new to this and its flying.. learned new things
Connie says Jun 30, 2008 01:38AM Lurkers are *always* welcome. So are participants, newbies to pros alike.
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 01:38AM i have no idea what you guys are talking about organizing, def have to re-read tomorrow
AmberCadabra says Jun 30, 2008 01:38AM I'm so GLAD for everyone here and I'm thrilled y'all stuck out the fast pace. My head hurts LOL
Te-ge says Jun 30, 2008 01:38AM connie hope you know you can call on me for anything you need, just let me know.
AzWebDude feels Jun 30, 2008 01:39AM teeg is correct when it comes to replying to a topic, thats why new threads need starting..and some need to die
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 01:39AM I agree w/Teeg...it's not like we're following Robert's Rules of order
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:39AM ckeithley Yep you're late to the party -- but we have them all the time, so scroll back and enjoy reading & watch for the next one!
CallKathy is Jun 30, 2008 01:39AM not going to be able to keep up with the plurkshop tonight for many reasons. *wonders* if it will be republished anywhere
AzWebDude thinks Jun 30, 2008 01:40AM (hard to do at this moment to) that amberCadabra did a great job, also that she owes pitcchers of margarittas
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:40AM Agree that the conversation drifts on these plurkshops; nature of people and tools.
DebInAustin says Jun 30, 2008 01:40AM thanks everyone! I gotta grab some chow! I look forward to reading the thread tomorrow. Great job Amber & crew!
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 01:40AM callkathy I'm going to summarize and post to my blog about it, so I'll plurk the link. Check back on this thread and the timeline
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:40AM Other alternative is for host to moderate; this forum not ideal for moderation though.
AzWebDude wishes Jun 30, 2008 01:41AM the same as callKathy HEY KATHY that this whole thing is posted somewhere for all the great tools mentioned!
Tim Jackson Jun 30, 2008 01:41AM My head hurts too Amber- but it could be the skull fracture and 3 cracked vertebrae. Maybe. I dunno.
Beth Harte says Jun 30, 2008 01:41AM teeg, I don't think David's on the PlurkShop, you might want to plurk him in another plurk...
templestark Jun 30, 2008 01:42AM agrees a more narrowly defined topic would help immensely. A little moderator, hence the "hosting duties."
acnatta says Jun 30, 2008 01:42AM well I'll eventually catch up on this one later on to find out what happened and drop notes to folks later on
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:42AM bookmark the URL to this thread so you can come back and reread: www.plurk.com/p/v4rf
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 01:42AM thanks all but I did very little. I'll do my part by recapping and posting by tomorrow. I'll link in this thread and on the timeline.
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 01:42AM the ultimate irony is that I've added about 7 Twitter followers since I started yammerin about THIS convo there!
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 01:43AM i think some topic refinement is good, and we should talk about moderation that will be helpful and not limit the conversation
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 01:43AM I would have gotten about 7 in last hour if I had been talking ON twitter instead
AzWebDude says Jun 30, 2008 01:43AM AmberCadabra..well if you were in AZ I might offer to buy for you..
CallKathy asks Jun 30, 2008 01:43AM that the link be plurked in another plurk as well as here. and is glad that it will be blogged!
AzWebDude shares Jun 30, 2008 01:45AM that I too was on Twitter at the start...so doing both was difficult
JenniferLaycock says Jun 30, 2008 01:45AM Hmm, I think I can pull at least a dozen blog posts out of this convo, now THERE is biz value.
jcass is Jun 30, 2008 01:45AM amazed how something everyone thinks is waste of time can be use to this great conversation.
Te-ge Jun 30, 2008 01:45AM tells callkathy if you click on the RSS feed up at the top of this page, you can subscribe to this and open it whenever you want.
templestark Jun 30, 2008 01:46AM glad to meet y'all. I need to breathe again. Bailing out the hatch . Thanks.
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:46AM Food for thought: we could limit plurkshops to 10 ppl per thread; have simultaneous threads going. Limiting would be done by using cliques.
emsgeiss says Jun 30, 2008 01:47AM AmberCadabra thanks for hosting. I have to bail for a bit..the boys are back from their walk. But I'll see you all in a bit, I'm sure.
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 01:47AM right seerysm, if we did this on Friendfeed, it would have about 40 replies at best now
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 01:47AM I have a zillion blog post ideas from this too. Ouch. Need to filter brain.
Te-ge says Jun 30, 2008 01:47AM cliques have a tendency to drop people...one that should have 30 people in it only sends to you connie.
Te-ge Jun 30, 2008 01:48AM thegypsy had this problem today too, one of his dropped from a large group to 4 people
AzWebDude thinks Jun 30, 2008 01:48AM that FF too if you have the right box checked would vere off all over..
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 01:48AM connie i like simultaneous threads, but still want a way for everyone to participate. I'm not giving up yet.
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:49AM Thanks for the tip, Teeg. Had no idea since I haven't been using cliques.
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 01:49AM bethharte suggested that we have a Plurk 101 and Plurk 201 plurkshops going at same time, might be good idea
Connie asks Jun 30, 2008 01:50AM Mack, which would you rather have. 40 comments in a day or two. Or 615 in less than 2 hrs.?
AzWebDude thinks Jun 30, 2008 01:50AM it would be cool for each thread to have a title like on seesmic, where there are multiple convos going, but you can respond where u want
AzWebDude thinks Jun 30, 2008 01:51AM the basic, how to respond etc can be a link at the top of this convo..thats all i was looking for..i went to twitter to get the answer
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 01:52AM Connie good point, depends on how 'deep' the comments go, if they build on each other, think 40 in a couple of days would be better
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 01:52AM i think we need to tweak this to maximize value, it's almost too active
AzWebDude says Jun 30, 2008 01:53AM AmberCadabra , true, but this topic is soo wide open, controlling that range may be tough..
Te-ge Jun 30, 2008 01:53AM wonders if a big plurkshop like this once a week, and then plurkshops evolved from that conversation over the rest of the week would work?
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:54AM MackCollier, agree that this is too overwhelming to be workable. We have to tweak it here, or try diferent venue such as CoverItLive.
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:55AM We need to count up how many different people participated. It was way busier than usual. I loved it, but it was hard to follow that fast.
ericaogrady says Jun 30, 2008 01:55AM feeling a little bit late to the party - but Hello All You Social Media Superstars
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 01:55AM mackcollier agree with you. Maybe a handful of us can brainstorm on a different thread.
AzWebDude thinks Jun 30, 2008 01:56AM mini topics of sorts, maybe Tuesdays are "blog days", I teach so I see the power of this..as well as the confusion/slow it down/this is cool
Connie says Jun 30, 2008 01:56AM Hey, ericaogrady. You missed the live action, but we'll we back with more plurkshop fun and conversation.
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 01:57AM Erica just mark it and read later, that's what I'm going to do! www.plurk.com/p/v4rf
acnatta Jun 30, 2008 01:58AM enjoys seeing the convos but misses some of the interaction of the earlier ones...
Connie Jun 30, 2008 01:58AM Teeg, you have a point. We would have seen Moby Twit about 1/4 of the way in.
Te-ge Jun 30, 2008 02:00AM pointed out to a friend yesterday that Plurk is in beta...and still having less problems that twitter which should be in beta.
AzWebDude asks Jun 30, 2008 02:00AM if anyone here is woth Plurk? or is that a "show", "broadcast", or what
Te-ge thinks Jun 30, 2008 02:01AM this one felt rushed, but still there is something to a huge chat. Definitely not all the time, but good sometimes.
Connie Jun 30, 2008 02:02AM ablereach Thanks for lurking. Glad you enjoyed the experiment -- we're trying to figure out the best way to include lots of ppl.
Te-ge Jun 30, 2008 02:03AM AzWebDude None of us are with Plurk, it's just that this is a good medium to have discussions like these.
MackCollier says Jun 30, 2008 02:03AM ok guys I have to duck out for a while, will be back later or tomorrow, just amazing thread everyone! Amber!
Connie Jun 30, 2008 02:03AM Teeg, one thing we could do is for some of us really talkative ones (ahem, like me) to agree to take a back seat and lurk.
Connie Jun 30, 2008 02:03AM Maybe we should invite someone w/ Plurk to join us, and show how we're using the cool site they built.
Te-ge Jun 30, 2008 02:05AM I wonder if we took these discussions and split them into natural breaks, could they then be posted as a blog post?
Te-ge Jun 30, 2008 02:05AM That would give others the opportunity to read managable posts and join in the discussion without a time limit
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 02:06AM connie i thought about that! be the facilitators and then just hush LOL but then peeps would miss having perspective from some veterans
AzWebDude asks Jun 30, 2008 02:06AM teeg, once I got a few things I was ok.. lol if being 200 msgs behind is ok..i loved the value of new stuff I got.. now to play
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 02:06AM rickwolff well, the whirlwind is certainly past, i think. but bookmark the page and you can catch up later, and join the next one
AzWebDude loves Jun 30, 2008 02:07AM the term " veterans" that AmberCadabra used..LOL veterans in something that is not even a year old maybe
MarketingMag says Jun 30, 2008 02:08AM wow - so late to this excellent initiative. As a publisher, I'm forever chasing interesting stories and conversations.
AzWebDude will Jun 30, 2008 02:09AM be back for the next one if someone tells him about it..going to make dinner.. margarittas(AmberCadabra) and gonna go see what all I missed.
Te-ge thinks Jun 30, 2008 02:09AM AmberCadabra probably means social media veterans...some of us have been doing this a while.
MarketingMag says Jun 30, 2008 02:09AM a Plurkshop specifically on listening and monitoring tools would be a great resource.
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 02:10AM AzWebDude if you follow me, connie, mackcollier teeg or debindenver you're bound to hear about the next one
AmberCadabra Jun 30, 2008 02:11AM marketingmag agreed! I'm hoping we can get JenniferLaycock to do one.
AzWebDude is Jun 30, 2008 02:11AM following all of those and some on Twitter.. thanks!!! assuming twitter works and I see teh twitt...
amsall says Jun 30, 2008 02:20AM WOW, 671 responses!!! Congrats to the host AmberCadabra, Connie, MackCollier, JenniferLaycock, and all. I just lurked and listened
Amie says Jun 30, 2008 02:47AM holy frak, I am late to this party. And just read allll of what came above before posting. Great social media meta to ponder!
Amie says Jun 30, 2008 02:48AM I will definitely have to re-read this all tomorrow with fresh eyeballs.
MapleMama asks Jun 30, 2008 02:51AM if there were be a synopsis or plurkpoint of this. I can't read all this tonight!
rumford thinks Jun 30, 2008 05:02PM that the fact that you can have all the comments on one page on plurk is truly amazing
Connie says Jun 30, 2008 05:45PM rumford - so good to see you here! I love the threaded comments here & opening it up in page view really makes it easier to read.
Connie says Jun 30, 2008 05:45PM Hope you'll join us for another plurkshop. Lots of good discussions going on around here.