June 26, 2008 at 18:00Lüna TicksaysI don't claim to know, but wouldn't it take more than 140 characters to explain?
June 26, 2008 at 18:01robdubyaSORRY, what the head makes cloudy, the HEART makes very clear.......
June 26, 2008 at 18:31codyrobertsayslead with your heart, follow with your head
June 26, 2008 at 20:07Jane Chinsaysan example is someone who is said to be materialistic vs. one who is said to be "spiritual".
June 26, 2008 at 20:08Jane Chinsaysanother example I'm thinking of is whether one can blend business approach with spiritual approach.
June 26, 2008 at 20:08Jane Chinhasseen ego-bashing by so-called gurus who claim to be enlightened. I think we have egos for specific reasons and it's all about perspective.
June 26, 2008 at 20:39netheadasksego is what makes mankind; for good or bad
June 26, 2008 at 21:49gasshosaysego is software to live in this world. it's needed. best kept in check by spiritual bird's eye view.
June 26, 2008 at 21:54gasshosayshead & heart aren't incompatible, neither is material & spiritual. i'm a soulpreneur for instance & that's service marked.
June 26, 2008 at 21:55gasshosaysb4 the heart let's look at brain: 2 hemispheres, with band of nerves in middle, corpus callosum designed to let 2 hemis communicate.
June 26, 2008 at 21:56gasshosayswhole brain thinking, not lopsided 1 or the other. wholeness can start right in the brain & continue to the heart.
June 26, 2008 at 21:57gasshosayswill get back to you on heart.
June 26, 2008 at 22:05gasshosaysthe heart is mystical. the sufis have an expression "see with the eyes of the heart" which i love & attempt to live by.
June 26, 2008 at 22:10gasshosayswhen we cultivate deeper brain waves thru various practices the heart opens & leads.
June 26, 2008 at 22:33Jane Chinwantsto find a happy blend of head and heart where both contribute to one's conscious evolution
June 26, 2008 at 22:34Jane Chinsaysgassho indeed I also am exploring the concept of the Heart Mind.
June 26, 2008 at 22:48LivSimpl.comWhat are everyone's thoughts on spirituality and/or organized religion? Just curious.
June 26, 2008 at 22:56Jane Chinthinksan analogy is critical thinking and science. one (science) is supposed to foster another (thinking) but sometimes cause becomes the effect.
June 26, 2008 at 23:12gasshosayslivsimpl ne'er the twain shall meet. spirituality is the essence of religion which is a distorted outer husk, unfortunately.
June 26, 2008 at 23:13Jane Chinsaysi'm not sure i agree, gassho ... spirituality is a desired effect of religion and is more cause-effect than 2 tracks aiming to meet
June 26, 2008 at 23:17LivSimpl.comI agree w/ janechin. New question: what is spirituality? Is it a belief in God? Discuss.
June 26, 2008 at 23:19gasshosaysreligion doesn't give true access to spirituality. it could but it's become too rigid & authoritarian. it may aim at spirituality but misses
June 26, 2008 at 23:19LivSimpl.comgasso - That's a fairly broad statement considering how many different types of religions there are out there.
June 26, 2008 at 23:20gasshosaystheism isn't necessarily a component of spirituality.
June 26, 2008 at 23:20gasshosaysit's broad but ppl are leaving religions in droves. why?
June 26, 2008 at 23:21gasshosaysall i'm saying is that the pulpit isn't serving the way it was designed. it could, but there's too much dogma.
June 26, 2008 at 23:29LivSimpl.comOut of curiosity, how *should* the pulpit be used?
June 26, 2008 at 23:32gasshosaysi'm not a *shouder* as they say don't should on yerself.
June 26, 2008 at 23:32gasshosayssince you asked tho: to access spirituality.
June 26, 2008 at 23:53Jane Chinthinksthe original intent of religion is to create access to spirituality, but ego loves to set up structures and rites, and behold, religion.
June 26, 2008 at 23:53Jane Chinthinksand religions themselves aren't necessarily antithetical to attaining spirituality, but ego loves to interpret, and behold, fundamentalism.
June 26, 2008 at 23:54AmberCadabrathinksjanechin and i will get along just fine
June 27, 2008 at 03:31Jane Chinasksand who says we can't go deep in 140 characters or less (Ok some of us write multiple strings but STILL!)
June 27, 2008 at 03:51gasshosaysi find it reduces redundancy.
June 27, 2008 at 03:57LivSimpl.comHowever, I don't think all rites/structure is ego-based.
June 27, 2008 at 04:26Jane Chinlivsimpl usually true for those that provide evidence and historical lineage of rationale for rite or structure. "I said so" doesn't count.
June 27, 2008 at 04:26Jane Chin(the "I" meaning authority figure that is not God or the Godhead)
June 27, 2008 at 16:59LivSimpl.comjanechin - as a scientist, do you struggle with science v. faith?
June 27, 2008 at 17:30gasshosaysspirituality *is* a science.
June 27, 2008 at 20:28Jane Chinhasno problem admitting I don't know/can't explain everything and the fact that "science" by definition is aimed at seeking truth.
June 27, 2008 at 20:28Jane Chinhasalso observed that some scientists behave similarly to fundamentalists in narrowmindedness and intolerance for other p.o.v.
June 28, 2008 at 05:43SandyBBerrysaysFIrst, know your heart's desire.
June 28, 2008 at 15:42Jane ChinasksSandyBBerry what's a good approach to know your heart's desire
June 28, 2008 at 15:55SandyBBerrysaysListen to the echoes... those thoughts and ideas you return to. Watch your dreams for repeating themes. Our hearts speak.
June 28, 2008 at 19:15Jane Chinlikessandybberry 's suggestion of listening to echoes. I'm learning to hold a thought in my heart and feel what comes.