DaisyOlsen says apparently some on Twitter are starting an anti-plurk movement. I can't help but wonder why they feel the need to do this.

62 responses to this plurk.

• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:33 PlurkingPoppa because they are rightfully intimidated by the mighty newcomer!
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:34 erinsap says cant we all just get along??
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:34 pugofwar says really? link plz?
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:35 HighDef dem dam haterz. Why cain't we all jes' git along?
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:35 DaisyOlsen it's sort of an underground thing. I'm picking it up in dribs and drabs. Some are adding berets to their pics to show support...
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:35 PlurkingPoppa wonders if conflict wasn't fun, why humans would be doing it for all of their recorded history?
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:36 dazcox says at least plurk doesn't freeze up 3 times a day!
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:37 pugofwar says berets...i love it
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:37 RaaVi says Hope not yet ...
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:38 PlurkingPoppa thinks that dazcox just uttered fighting words... let me run over to Twitter and quote you!
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:38 HighDef thinks those beret-wearing Tweeters had better be careful lest they be mistaken for French-lovers.
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:41 DaisyOlsen twitter.com/lizwebpage/statuses/840418878
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:42 DaisyOlsen still trying to find the root of it
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:46 DaisyOlsen Been more than a week LOL It's apparently a very exclusive group. They don't want spies I guess.
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:46 HighDef quotes: "The root of all enmity is ignorance". I'm sure that applies to the beret-wearing anti-plurk twit contingent.
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:48 DaisyOlsen The founder of the group is now following my Twitter feed HA!
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:49 PlurkingPoppa send them my Plurk feed!
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:49 MoBarger says www.google.com/search?q=anti-pl*rk
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:50 ☆ Rammi → wants everybody to be shiny and smiley and to be able to get along.
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:52 ☆ Rammi → wants everybody to be shiny and smiley and to be able to get along.
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:52 ☆ Rammi → hates double Plurks.
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:52 PlurkingPoppa thinks Rammi is a Twitter agent
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:52 SharonHH thinks there's nothing wrong with being on both
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:53 jkrabbit ppl get use to a format , like aim or yahoo, some of those ppl don't know what twitter is
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:53 PlurkingPoppa is on both because he's a Plurk agent
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:53 nightsky believes we should go spam them on Twitter! Bring that thing down!
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:54 DaisyOlsen would appreciate not having her Twitter rep ruined. I do a good job of that without help
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:54 MoBarger says an interesting difference between them is google picks up tweets by default; plurks are not.
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 19:57 DaisyOlsen this is true
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 20:01 PlurkingPoppa promises that he won't mention the name of DaisyOlsen "on my scout's honour!" (uncrossing fingers now)
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 20:01 hunter thinks the whole berret thing is a bit childish
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 20:57 seerysm says I don't talk about Plurk on Twitter anymore, was excited 2 share my experience w/ people I thought would be interested at first, but no more
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 21:25 bigepaz thinks the underground movement is outright lame.
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 21:25 DaisyOlsen I hear ya seerysm! Twitter has territory issues
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 21:54 margalit says Just went to check it out, and it's OVER CAPACITY. I hate that frigging whale!
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 21:57 momtrepreneur feels sorry for anti-plurkers
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 22:08 bunneh says how bizarre!
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 22:09 Veribatim says Its pretty amazing how people take things so out of context. I can't say I'm surprised.
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 22:10 loquacious says Because they're lame and need to get lives?
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 22:11 gassho asks who cares? don't we collectively have real situations that need solutions?! this nano alternate reality mustn't trump the real communities!
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 22:16 CraftyMoni thinks the whole anti-plurk beret wearing thing is weird.
• 
  June 21, 2008 at 22:29 54degrees like scoble said: Twitter is for posting what you are doing (going to shower) and not for conversations!
• 
  June 22, 2008 at 00:19 Lumpit asks how the f do you have real conversations on Twitter anyway? Plurk is designed for conversations! Twitter is for saying what you're drinking
• 
  June 22, 2008 at 00:57 Finucane thought Twitter was for pimping your latest blog post? I'm confused.
• 
  June 22, 2008 at 01:12 lizwebpage says I KNOW! WTH is WRONG with those people! Can't they just get ALONG! C'mon, let's all sing Kum By Ya now and join hands!
• 
  June 22, 2008 at 01:21 lizwebpage says really, peeps, you're not taking this seriously, are you? B/c we are certainly not serious! It's a JOKE! \
• 
  June 22, 2008 at 01:22 pprlisa says OMG this is outrageous!!!
• 
  June 22, 2008 at 01:31 pprlisa says yes, clearly we both have plurk accounts - cant go without the new shiny thing - but chill pls, we are just makin our peeps laugh
• 
  June 22, 2008 at 02:46 lizwebpage Y'know, there is nothing exclusive ever on Twitter. Please if you see me, feel free to jump right in. Really, just say hi anytime!
• 
  June 22, 2008 at 03:04 DaisyOlsen is glad to hear you are having fun. And I didn't mean to take anything out of context. Proof that conversations are harder on Twitter LOL
• 
  June 22, 2008 at 03:05 pprlisa says oohhhh touche!!
• 
  June 22, 2008 at 03:06 DaisyOlsen I'm quite amused. I've been complaining today about how uptight Twitter seems to me now
• 
  June 22, 2008 at 03:24 lizwebpage says sorry if we seemed uptight. Really, everything was meant in jest. We are silly people, truly, check out my stream! Heee!
• 
  June 22, 2008 at 03:25 DaisyOlsen means Twitter in General is more uptight, I think it's very easy to lose important pieces of information because of the way it's set up.
• 
  June 22, 2008 at 03:26 DaisyOlsen didn't mean to point at any particular person!!!!!
• 
  June 22, 2008 at 03:29 pprlisa says no, youre right, Liz is an uptight PITA. ignore her here, on twitter, everywhere...
• 
  June 22, 2008 at 03:30 DaisyOlsen ha! See my real plan was to get the two of you on Plurk. Yeah...that's it...
• 
  June 22, 2008 at 03:34 pprlisa says I still dont get it - it just doesnt work for me - UI is too confusing but too each his own
• 
  June 22, 2008 at 03:35 DaisyOlsen I said that at first also, now I'm a top user. Go figure.
• 
  June 22, 2008 at 18:16 jr15644 says wow...this is one of the longest Plurks I have read...