frankmartin thinks worrying about **karma** increasing or decreasing constitutes a disproportionate amount of Plurk discussion.

15 responses to this plurk.

• 
  June 18, 2008 at 13:46 frankmartin says and it makes us post mindless stuff, just to get the number of Plurks up
• 
  June 18, 2008 at 13:46 tamar says you may be right, but plurk makes it hard to get karma. they assume you need to be addicted to get it.
• 
  June 18, 2008 at 13:47 tamar says and that kind of sucks.
• 
  June 18, 2008 at 13:47 frankmartin says I've done it too. But for me, no more.
• 
  June 18, 2008 at 13:47 tamar says it's a forced situation
• 
  June 18, 2008 at 13:47 tamar does n't like it at all
• 
  June 18, 2008 at 13:48 frankmartin says tamar I agree. I think it's amusing that I have found myself playing the game too.
• 
  June 18, 2008 at 13:49 frankmartin says no more!
• 
  June 18, 2008 at 13:52 Beth Harte says agreed! No more! Karma ban on posting mindless stuff.
• 
  June 18, 2008 at 13:53 ConnieinDenver will not respond to any future plurks about karma. Tired of it.
• 
  June 18, 2008 at 13:56 Beth Harte says me too connie. Let's have some real conversations.
• 
  June 18, 2008 at 13:58 robyn says agreed. I could care less about the number. I'm defined by a site's ranking of me, for goodness sakes
• 
  June 18, 2008 at 14:04 sonnygill agrees with tamar and frankmartin. Its basically a ploy and has ppl baiting the system.
• 
  June 18, 2008 at 14:09 DebInDenver says OK. We have a moratorium on karma discussions.
• 
  June 18, 2008 at 15:07 LindaZ says muting this convo...