Plurk

24 responses to this plurk (Jump to bottom)

  • hatkirby is
    horrified. Goodness, that's privacy infringement. I thought a BANK of all places would know better.
  • Lightening says
    looks like it might well backfire on them too.
  • rah says
    bastards! :-o
  • flashman says
    Clumsy. As. Fuck.
  • MarketingMag says
    still amazed by the lack of understanding around permission marketing. Spoke to a freind about the idea of 'brand rape' yesterday ...
  • MarketingMag says
    ... where the brand takes the trusty its consumers have in it and violates that trust in a truly appalling and terminally destructive way.
  • MarketingMag says
    facibus yeah, so true. What gets me is that they are all falling over themselves to put out campaigns about how friendly and nice ...
  • MarketingMag says
    they are, and then none of them deliver any better services. In amongst record profits, they all raise interest rates regardless.
  • MarketingMag says
    What about doing something genuinely great for their customers, rather than just talking like they care and f#$%&@g everyone over (s_angry)
  • flashman says
    as I posted on the comments, an Aussie Big 4 bank should come up with a social media financial site. Australia loves talking about money.
  • MarketingMag says
    trouble is flashman, that there's such a lack of trust in what the big banks do, people wouldn't believe their sincerity in social media.
  • Te-ge
    wonders if you have credit unions in Australia. Here in the US they're almost always better and the people are nicer.
  • joxmcrox loves
    Spam.....NOT!!!!!!!!! aaarghhhhh (woot)

Ads