bloggeries thinks Jun 16, 2008 07:30PM you should need X Karma to add a live link. Keep spammers away and reward dedicated users. plurkable.com/2008/06/16/plurk-adds-live-links-in-profiles/
bloggeries says Jun 16, 2008 07:32PM it works at 0 right now. I just think you'll find people signing up filling in a tone of links and never coming back. Not desirable.
Teej says Jun 16, 2008 07:33PM Yes but neither are the trash plurks people make to boost their karma.
bloggeries says Jun 16, 2008 07:33PM I am pretty sure if you make an ORIGINAL plurk with the K word in it you don't get credit. That would discourage negative behavior.
Konstantino Jun 16, 2008 07:34PM They've had this for a while, but you can always check what URL you're going to before you click it with your browser.
bloggeries says Jun 16, 2008 07:34PM Similarly with Goodmorning, goodnight. Imagine the bandwith required when 1 million people are on if everyone exchanged night time greets?
bloggeries says Jun 16, 2008 07:34PM Must act like a lifeguard at a pool and not the ambulance with a stretcher....
biggboss says Jun 16, 2008 07:52PM this karma thing is too easy, spammers can get karma 10x faster than we do
bloggeries says Jun 16, 2008 07:55PM I think you mean hours? I'd say too many to count. I'm doing other stuff to I don't exclusively plurk. Well sometimes.
MikeonTV feels Jun 16, 2008 09:06PM It should first give the nofolloe tag and rewardtop karma holders witha free indexable link
Eyebee says Jun 18, 2008 01:57PM he doesn't worry about it, it's an annoyance sometimes, and would NEVER go private to avoid spammers. It's they that need eradicating.
DSN thinks Aug 10, 2008 04:54PM *artificial restraints* won't stop spammers/gamers. look how well it works for software, movie, & music manufacturers...
