bloggeries thinks you should need X Karma to add a live link. Keep spammers away and reward dedicated users. plurkable.com/2008/06/16/plurk-adds-live-links-in-profiles/

40 responses to this plurk.

• 
  June 16, 2008 at 19:31 nibbler says seems to work at 33
• 
  June 16, 2008 at 19:32 jaybol thinks this is a great idea
• 
  June 16, 2008 at 19:32 bloggeries says it works at 0 right now. I just think you'll find people signing up filling in a tone of links and never coming back. Not desirable.
• 
  June 16, 2008 at 19:33 Teej says Yes but neither are the trash plurks people make to boost their karma.
• 
  June 16, 2008 at 19:33 Signal says I agree with you Bloggeries. Next thing you know people are going to be linking to Pornography and that wouldn't be pleasant.
• 
  June 16, 2008 at 19:33 bloggeries says I am pretty sure if you make an ORIGINAL plurk with the K word in it you don't get credit. That would discourage negative behavior.
• 
  June 16, 2008 at 19:33 ErinSap says xlnt idea!! The spammers will come soon enough!
• 
  June 16, 2008 at 19:34 Konstantino They've had this for a while, but you can always check what URL you're going to before you click it with your browser.
• 
  June 16, 2008 at 19:34 bloggeries says Similarly with Goodmorning, goodnight. Imagine the bandwith required when 1 million people are on if everyone exchanged night time greets?
• 
  June 16, 2008 at 19:34 bloggeries says Must act like a lifeguard at a pool and not the ambulance with a stretcher....
• 
  June 16, 2008 at 19:41 jayseae thinks that is a good idea - makes people work for it.
• 
  June 16, 2008 at 19:43 milwaukeeseo likes that idea man. Another Karma reward. Groovin' on that.
• 
  June 16, 2008 at 19:52 biggboss says this karma thing is too easy, spammers can get karma 10x faster than we do
• 
  June 16, 2008 at 19:53 oyunfound says thats a very good idea
• 
  June 16, 2008 at 19:55 TerenceChang asks bloggeries how many house has he spent on Plurk and Twitter.
• 
  June 16, 2008 at 19:55 bloggeries says I think you mean hours? I'd say too many to count. I'm doing other stuff to I don't exclusively plurk. Well sometimes.
• 
  June 16, 2008 at 19:56 ThatDude thinks that's a great idea.
• 
  June 16, 2008 at 20:54 ppmartin has just commented directly on your blog. In short: good idea.
• 
  June 16, 2008 at 21:06 MikeonTV feels It should first give the nofolloe tag and rewardtop karma holders witha free indexable link
• 
  June 18, 2008 at 13:39 Eyebee concurs
• 
  June 18, 2008 at 13:40 Awflasher(阿瓦) says Great idea, shut up the damn spammers!
• 
  June 18, 2008 at 13:43 Eyebee thinks spammers should be executed slowly.
• 
  June 18, 2008 at 13:43 Signal says Lord, I gotta say i agree nonless
• 
  June 18, 2008 at 13:48 MichaelKing says I have to agree with you
• 
  June 18, 2008 at 13:57 Eyebee says he doesn't worry about it, it's an annoyance sometimes, and would NEVER go private to avoid spammers. It's they that need eradicating.
• 
  August 05, 2008 at 23:23 GrantMc says i totally agree
• 
  August 10, 2008 at 10:36 mopedronin interesting thot.
• 
  August 10, 2008 at 16:54 DSN thinks *artificial restraints* won't stop spammers/gamers. look how well it works for software, movie, & music manufacturers...
• 
  August 11, 2008 at 13:04 Liz says agreed. Haven't encountered many spammers but it's a good idea.
• 
  August 11, 2008 at 13:07 andysp says agreed bloggeries
• 
  August 12, 2008 at 14:54 ppmartin says support bloggeries suggestion While it won't keep all spammers away, it is a step in the right direction.
• 
  August 12, 2008 at 14:55 ppmartin says but as fabuliz highlighted, we have fortunately not suffered to much spamming (yet) on Plurk
• 
  August 12, 2008 at 14:57 ppmartin hopes it will be possible to edit responses for typos one day (please read "too much" in the previous comment).
• 
  November 27, 2008 at 12:29 eijay feels happy. congrats Plurk