DBlume thinks Jan 26, 2012 06:31AM maybe davidd freed himself from the attention-deficit inducing tyranny of social sites. Good for him, then.
davidd says Jan 29, 2012 03:16AM addressing the second article first: I disagree with much of it. Yes, I understand Social Media Fatigue.
davidd says Jan 29, 2012 03:18AM that's why I'm not on Plurk as much. Sometimes I scan Twitter from work, as an escapist tool, but few of my Plurk friends tweet anymore.
DBlume says Jan 29, 2012 03:18AM I thought you'd be amused that Alexia seemingly wasn't even aware of the consequences of what she was admitting to.
davidd says Jan 29, 2012 03:18AM but, at work, for example: there is nobody with whom I share many, or any, interests.
DBlume says Jan 29, 2012 03:19AM like having no attention span is normal, and is the target marketplace to which content makers should aim.
davidd says Jan 29, 2012 03:19AM I don't go online to seek acclaim from strangers. I go online to find people sharing my eclectic combination of interests...
davidd says Jan 29, 2012 03:21AM I don't know why other people spend time online. I see lots of people, girls mostly, on the beach typing into their phones. What's the point
davidd Jan 29, 2012 03:21AM ... of going to Hawaii if you're spending your time texting and surfing FaceBook? But for some people, that's what works. Because...
davidd Jan 29, 2012 03:22AM ... what's the point of snapping toy pictures and posting them on Flickr? I dunno, but countless thousands of people do it!
davidd was Jan 29, 2012 03:23AM kind of internet addicted. Still am, actually. I get edgy when I can't post my daily photos. I grow irritable when I can't access...
davidd Jan 29, 2012 03:24AM ... information immediately. I LOVE having immediate access to answers to questions!
davidd says Jan 29, 2012 03:25AM as I mentioned long ago, Flickr suffices, for me, as a blogging & social networking outlet. I don't have time for much beyond that.
davidd says Jan 29, 2012 03:27AM I strongly disagree with the premise of the "Drugs" article that surfing Instagram pics rather than watching movies is "alarming."
davidd says Jan 29, 2012 03:27AM Instagram shows you what real people are doing in the real world. It's not passively spoon-feeding you corporate content.
davidd says Jan 29, 2012 03:28AM as an Instagram user, you can interact by leaving comments or posting your own content. Money is not a significant access barrier.
davidd Jan 29, 2012 03:29AM rarely watches movies or TV either. In my free time, I'm on Flickr, or reading online articles that catch my interest.
davidd thinks Jan 29, 2012 03:30AM most movies & TV shows are boring and confining. I have to endure the pacing, whether too fast or too slow.
davidd says Jan 29, 2012 03:30AM online, I can consume at my leisure, whether skimming or savoring in depth, as time and mood dictate.
davidd says Jan 29, 2012 03:31AM online, I can express my opinion; even if nobody is listening, at least I get the satisfaction of expressing myself regarding the content.
davidd says Jan 29, 2012 03:31AM in the "olden days," when TV was broadcast and there were only a few channels, chances are friends at work or school watched the same...
davidd Jan 29, 2012 03:32AM shows you did the previous night, and you could discuss them the next day. Now, with so many media choices, it's easier to go online to...
davidd is Jan 29, 2012 03:34AM more interested in creative efforts on a small scale from individuals rather than big-budget corporate media productions.
davidd asks Jan 29, 2012 03:36AM as the Instagram article asks, why bother watching a narrative that isn’t connected to you...
davidd Jan 29, 2012 03:36AM when you can pop open your iPhone and get a quick hit of rarefied entertainment from people you actually know?
davidd says Jan 29, 2012 03:36AM or, people you can come to know, over time, by following their Plurk or Twitter or Flickr or LJ or Instagram streams.
davidd says Jan 29, 2012 03:40AM unfortunately, I'm unlikely to become acquainted with Jessica Alba by watching movies.
davidd says Jan 29, 2012 03:41AM but I've become "friends" with Cami via Flickr, and we regularly "converse" via comment streams, emails, and occasional snail mail.
davidd Jan 29, 2012 03:44AM <agrees> with concerns about diminishing attention spans (having read Maggie Jackson's "Distracted," Nick Carr's "The Shallows," and...
davidd Jan 29, 2012 03:45AM Chris Hedges' "Empire of Illusion," plus having tried to sit thru TV shows recently on the Nickelodeon channel.
davidd was Jan 29, 2012 03:46AM a bit shell-shocked by the blitz of images and ads on Nickelodeon. The steady narrative pace of the old "Jonny Quest" episodes is not...
davidd Jan 29, 2012 03:47AM ... anywhere in evidence in the new "Monster High" TV specials, or in the 3-minute online animated webisodes.
davidd says Jan 29, 2012 03:47AM and of course, I see the difficulty kids have concentrating in school on a daily basis. After trying to watch that Monster High show on...
davidd Jan 29, 2012 03:48AM ... Nickelodeon, however, I saw how outmoded old-school teaching style has become. Kids need stuff FAST to stay engaged. At least, that's...
davidd Jan 29, 2012 03:49AM ... how they're being trained to respond by TV and movies. Fast-action cutting, the norm in TV promo teasers, is training us all to look...
davidd Jan 29, 2012 03:50AM ... and to respond primally (lots of sexual imagery in those fast-paced ads) rather than thinking and following.
davidd says Jan 29, 2012 03:50AM thus, movies and TV are actually worse for thinking and concentrating, IMHO, than Instagram or Twitter.
davidd Jan 29, 2012 03:51AM <agrees> that Instagram and other online infotainment is killing Hollywood. That's the real purpose behind PIPA and SOPA: stop the public!
davidd thinks Jan 29, 2012 03:52AM Hollywood & the media want us to CONSUME, not produce. The goal of SOPA is ultimately to reduce the internet to a one-way information flow,
davidd Jan 29, 2012 03:53AM from them to us, just like movies and broadcast TV. The government agrees; they fear the power of flash-mobbing. They don't like it that...
davidd Jan 29, 2012 03:54AM anyone, anywhere, can upload real-time content; like our bold US Marines urinating on dead bodies, for example.
davidd says Jan 29, 2012 03:55AM Or organizing flash-mobs via Twitter. Or pushing Ron Paul for President. If Paul didn't have massive online support, mostly from...
davidd Jan 29, 2012 03:56AM ... young, "disaffected youth," he would have been brushed aside as a protest candidate.
davidd thinks Jan 29, 2012 03:57AM even comparatively innocuous user-generated content, like Amazon movie reviews, is a threat to corporate media. Amazon users tell us...
davidd Jan 29, 2012 03:57AM ... if a movie sucks; we don't have to settle for Roger Ebert's opinion, we can search for and find, on topic-specific forums, what people..
davidd Jan 29, 2012 03:58AM who share OUR specific niche interests think about movies, TV, books, or whatever else we're considering investing our time in.
davidd says Jan 29, 2012 03:59AM and chances are, we'll get so involved in an online discussion, or looking at viewer-generated content, that we won't get around to...
davidd Jan 29, 2012 04:00AM <agrees> that Instagram (as a type of content) is better than movies or TV, and is definitely a threat to Hollywood.
davidd says Jan 29, 2012 04:01AM when a YouTube video of guy in a zebra costume dancing around his back yard can generate 40,000 hits in a day, for a budget of ZERO...
davidd Jan 29, 2012 04:03AM ... Hollywood must be worried. When people like DBlume and davidd can discuss, without corporate mediation, this issue...
davidd Jan 29, 2012 04:04AM on a public forum, for potentially ANYONE to read and think about, Hollywood and the New York publishing industry will worry.
davidd says Jan 29, 2012 04:05AM the immediacy, the personal relevance, and the social aspects of user-generated content have effectively killed newspapers.
davidd says Jan 29, 2012 04:06AM the magazine industry is disappearing. Television and movies are depending on an ever-older demographic, because the younger viewers...
davidd Jan 29, 2012 04:07AM ... are creating and consuming content from their peers and have less time to sit passively in front of a screen.
davidd says Jan 29, 2012 04:07AM old people don't go to movies as much (fixed income vs ten bucks to see what is likely to be a lousy movie).
davidd wonders Jan 29, 2012 04:08AM which will disappear first, the big-budget motion picture, or series television?
davidd Jan 29, 2012 04:09AM <agrees> with the Instagram article, but isn't all that keen on Instagram itself, even tho' several of my Flickr friends are using it.
davidd is Jan 29, 2012 04:10AM still not a fan of over-processed blurry cell phone snapshots (even though I post a fair number myself, when I'm tired or in a hurry).
davidd Jan 29, 2012 04:11AM understands and appreciates the appeal of the visual equivalent of Twitter, though. With Instagram and equivalent options...
davidd Jan 29, 2012 04:12AM that pesky necessity of typing up to 140 characters is eliminated. Now, point, snap, click, and everybody in the world (potentially) can SEE
davidd asks Jan 29, 2012 04:19AM Or how scary, if you happen to be a crooked cop, a depraved soldier, or a Hollywood producer?
davidd Jan 29, 2012 04:20AM wrote about his amazement over media distribution possibilities in the caption to this Flickr photo:
DBlume says Jan 29, 2012 05:03AM Wow, Mr. D. I was hoping for a response, but I never expected all this in plurk replies!
DBlume wonders Jan 29, 2012 05:08AM if you're going to consolidate this into a blog of your own? (Are you even tempted to?) You've made interesting points.