Blogie thinks Jan 26, 2009 07:42PM the Davao local gov't is going overboard with its anti-smoking campaign
Blogie says Jan 26, 2009 11:43AM they're overstepping their bounds already. what davao is doing is bordering on fascism
Blogie says Jan 26, 2009 11:45AM 1st they want to make it close to impossible for ppl to buy ciggies. now they want to limit activities inside smoking areas --
Blogie says Jan 26, 2009 11:46AM making davao suitable for everyone is all well & good. but it is NOT their purview anymore to stop ppl fr smoking.
timoyness says Jan 26, 2009 11:48AM I don't get the no smoking and drinking on smoking areas. i mean,wtf.
DΦRk KnIgHt says Jan 26, 2009 11:49AM it's like saying if you're a smoker, bawal ka kumain o uminom ng tubig zzz
timoyness says Jan 26, 2009 11:51AM Me: Yes please. Waiter: Ok, you can sit, but you can't order. lol.
DΦRk KnIgHt says Jan 26, 2009 11:51AM if that ordinance is passed, it will spell the end of Torres Street
timoyness says Jan 26, 2009 11:58AM so anyway, how does the ordinance stand with davao city's people? what's the approval rating of it like? and how'd it affect businesses?
boink says Jan 26, 2009 12:02PM there are also non-smokers who would like to go out, enjoy themselves, and not inhale second-hand smoke.
timoyness says Jan 26, 2009 12:05PM and there are smokers who would also like to go out, have a few drinks and eat WHILE smoking. too bad we can't do that on smoking areas.
Blogie says Jan 26, 2009 12:05PM marocharim: there's been quite a few already who've told me that they don't wanna go to davao anymore due to the strict antismoking laws
Your Daddy says Jan 26, 2009 12:06PM Non-Smokers should stay home and stay healthy and let Smokers do the drinking and Cancer Stick inhalation.
boink says Jan 26, 2009 12:06PM the ordinance is not to keep people from smoking but to protect those who do not from ETS. ETS has been proven to cause cancer, etc...
boink says Jan 26, 2009 12:07PM blogie: the establishments were fined because they didn't follow guidelines set by the ordinance. It's awfully silly to put a sign...
Your Daddy says Jan 26, 2009 12:08PM Davao is becoming a Big Brother State, heard of the new 600 million peso Traffic Camera Project? WTF? 600M for traffic cameras?
boink says Jan 26, 2009 12:08PM that says "smoking area" right beside the the non-smoking area with out any barriers whatsoever
timoyness says Jan 26, 2009 12:08PM I Think what we need is common courtesy, not ordinances. in manila, you can smoke pretty much anywhere 'appropriate' .
Blogie says Jan 26, 2009 12:09PM actually, i agree with the strict anti-smoking ordinance, to protect non-smokers. BUT, making it a law to stop ppl fr smoking, THAT's diff.
Blogie says Jan 26, 2009 12:09PM boink: the issue here is not about the estabs that violated the existing ordinance. what we're discussing here is the new ordinances that--
timoyness says Jan 26, 2009 12:10PM boink: Oh believe me. that 600M will be coming out of our asses soon. traffic tickets galore.
Blogie says Jan 26, 2009 12:10PM --are being proposed to make it very difficult for smokers to buy ciggies & to disallow eating & drinking inside smoking areas.
timoyness says Jan 26, 2009 12:10PM boink: it's called common courtesy because it isn't taught, it's like common sense.
boink says Jan 26, 2009 12:10PM timoyness: right and the cameras will provide a more objectivity. No more he said, I said
Blogie says Jan 26, 2009 12:11PM there is no argument that smoking is bad. but the govt has no right to play god.
timoyness says Jan 26, 2009 12:12PM smoking: Banned, Next door neighboor burning truck loads of garbage: Not banned.
timoyness says Jan 26, 2009 12:13PM So you're saying us smokers don't know where or when to smoke? You don't see no smoking signs inside churches do you? do you see smokers..
boink says Jan 26, 2009 12:14PM timoyness:isn't it common courtesy for you not to blow smoke into other people's faces? I've had that done to me several times
Your Daddy says Jan 26, 2009 12:14PM Maybe our Dear Mayor's Bueger's Disease has been acting up lately that why there has been a spike in Apprehensions?
Blogie says Jan 26, 2009 12:14PM timoyness has a point there. he is like obama -- believes in the decency of man.
boink says Jan 26, 2009 12:15PM blogie: can you show me the news article that says they are proposing to make it more difficult to buy cigarettes & the thing about eating
timoyness says Jan 26, 2009 12:15PM boink: Do something about it then. kick that guy's face in or something.
timoyness says Jan 26, 2009 12:16PM boink: oh it's there, The fact that i can't enjoy a cig while having pizza or iced tea on piccobello made me stop going there.
Your Daddy says Jan 26, 2009 12:16PM I read it in the news, Takatak and ambulant vendors are no longer allowed to sell cigarettes....
boink says Jan 26, 2009 12:17PM timoyness: we're talking common courtesy not what needs to be done. My point is common courtesy cannot be relied upon since not many has it
boink says Jan 26, 2009 12:19PM or to prevent sale to minors perhaps? Ironic though since another vice, alcohol, can easily be bought with showing ID
Blogie says Jan 26, 2009 12:20PM boink: yan pa siguro. make it impossible for minors to buy cigarettes, and increase the minimum age. yan pa may sense!
timoyness says Jan 26, 2009 12:21PM ugh. I hate how they ban cigarettes near schools. convenience stores aren't exactly convenient anymore. an ID requirement would've been OK.
boink says Jan 26, 2009 12:21PM I agree to limiting access to minors but curtailing access to smokers might be a bit too much. They do have a valid concern as smoking...
Your Daddy says Jan 26, 2009 12:22PM One ordinance they should pass is to make it legal for adults to smack 12 year old hoodlums caught smoking in the streets...
boink says Jan 26, 2009 12:22PM ... does cause a lot of diseases and these diseases may affect health and productivity. But an ordinance that has the primary aim of...
DΦRk KnIgHt says Jan 26, 2009 12:22PM hala, so hindi lang takatak boys ang bawal. basically the ordinance will ban pati supermarkets... pano un?
boink says Jan 26, 2009 12:23PM ...restricting access is something I'm against. If they said that the primary aim was to stop minors from buying, maybe.
DΦRk KnIgHt says Jan 26, 2009 12:23PM lol, di bale, di naman covered ang bakeries, bebenta kami ng yosi
Blogie says Jan 26, 2009 12:25PM i wish a non-smoker would take this up, this issue against what the local govt is doing... kung ako kasi, di credible coz i smoke
Blogie says Jan 26, 2009 12:26PM the issue: gov't acting like a big brother; overstepping their role; being almost fascist
timoyness says Jan 26, 2009 12:26PM a ban on alcohol would be cool, that'd be like, the return of SPEAK EASYs. heh
timoyness says Jan 26, 2009 12:28PM lol, i can imagine ex-drug dealers going up to you and with a shady tone going "you wanna get drunk?"
DΦRk KnIgHt says Jan 26, 2009 12:29PM blogs, i read it again. i think the ordinance covers selling yosi by the stick lang. these establishments can still sell by the pack.
boink says Jan 26, 2009 12:30PM Where can I get a copy of this proposed ordinance? I'd like to read this some more
DΦRk KnIgHt says Jan 26, 2009 12:30PM just to make it more difficult for kids to buy cigarettes because they're more affordable by the stick.
Blogie says Jan 26, 2009 12:30PM andrew_ds: really? it says that there? but... why would such a distinction be made?
DΦRk KnIgHt says Jan 26, 2009 12:31PM Last paragraph: "If they do not readily see it and cannot afford to buy in packs, most will just have to stop," Laviña said.
Blogie says Jan 26, 2009 12:31PM boink: i do plan to blog about it. hafta compose my thoughts first -- don't wanna sound like a bitch in heat
Blogie says Jan 26, 2009 12:32PM andrew_ds: with all due respect to pete, i simply don't see how that's gonna be a deterrent. useless measure in that case, no?
DΦRk KnIgHt says Jan 26, 2009 12:32PM so i guess by "retail" they mean by the stick, by "wholesale" by the pack. wat da pack
timoyness says Jan 26, 2009 12:32PM OH FFS. Like that's gonna stop us. lol. first I have to drive 5 minutes to get a pack instead of just walking to the convenience @ the kanot
Migs Jan 26, 2009 12:33PM makisingit sa usapan... ilan po ba ang population ng smokers sa davao? maybe our lawmakers are thinking na if its for the good of....
Blogie says Jan 26, 2009 12:34PM buddymigs: again, the issue here is not about smoking itself. it's about how the gov't is behaving like a big brother.
boink says Jan 26, 2009 12:34PM what the?!? That's a weak proposition at that. People won't quit just because of limited access.
boink says Jan 26, 2009 12:35PM I guess someone ought to contact their local representative and change the wording
DΦRk KnIgHt says Jan 26, 2009 12:36PM achully we can't discount that smoking is harmful and it is part of the issue. but if they ban it like it's drugs, iba na un.
Blogie says Jan 26, 2009 12:36PM buddymigs: basta the issue here is about the dvo govt acting beyond proper governance.
Blogie says Jan 26, 2009 12:37PM like i said earlier, i acknowledge that smoking is bad for da health. but for govt to stop me fr smoking is akin to fascism.
timoyness says Jan 26, 2009 12:37PM oh and btw, would it be legal to turn your whole place into a smoking area and have a NON-SMOKING designated area?...
boink says Jan 26, 2009 12:38PM andrew_ds: I agree. I understand the need for the govt to look after its citizens. But if they start putting the cookies on top of the...
Your Daddy says Jan 26, 2009 12:38PM Our Dear Mayor is trying to "Save" his populace from Buerger;s Disease and Smoking related Illnesses, too bad we dont want to be saved...
Blogie says Jan 26, 2009 12:38PM boink: nanny-esque is the milder end of the spectrum. the other end is called hitler-esque
LadyChic says Jan 26, 2009 12:39PM grabe naman itong thread na ito... ang haba na. can't read all the posts at the top because parating may new post...
DΦRk KnIgHt says Jan 26, 2009 12:39PM speaking of buergers.. why don't they ban greasy hamburgers coz heart disease is our country's #2 killer, ya know
Blogie says Jan 26, 2009 12:39PM boink: the ordinance says 20% of an estab may be used for smoking. ok na yun, we all acquiesced to that. but now they want to change it to-
timoyness says Jan 26, 2009 12:40PM blogie: that's just plain ridiculous. coffee and beer = never complete without yosi.
DΦRk KnIgHt says Jan 26, 2009 12:40PM aww.. it's the same thing like drugs. you can't die of second hand shabu.
Migs Jan 26, 2009 12:41PM ayun nabasa ko na ang napakahabang thread... yun pala yun... Ang motto is: "if you can't beat them.. don't feed them"
Blogie says Jan 26, 2009 12:41PM timmyte: dats gonna be a good argument: will they try to ban cholesterol too??
boink says Jan 26, 2009 12:42PM regarding non-serving of food and drinks, that's another proposal that needs to have rational reason behind it. Give me a real good reason..
timoyness says Jan 26, 2009 12:42PM So how many people die each year of DUI, Drunken brawls,stabbings and shootings again?
Your Daddy says Jan 26, 2009 12:43PM a lot, alcohol, IMHO is the more dangerous "drug" compared to nicotine....
DΦRk KnIgHt says Jan 26, 2009 12:43PM ah which gives me an idea.. dapat may designated areas for smoking, drinking, and cholesterol.
timoyness says Jan 26, 2009 12:44PM boink: I think they should implement DUI arrests. that'd keep me from killing myself. but not smoking bans.
Blogie says Jan 26, 2009 12:44PM there are SOOOO many other more pressing problems in davao (drainage anyone?) -- so why are our councilors wasting time on this one??
timoyness says Jan 26, 2009 12:45PM I'll take a DUI fine any time over a seatbelt fine. lol, what's the use of a seatbelt on 40kph limited streets.
boink says Jan 26, 2009 12:46PM timoyness: I'd agree about DUIs though. Problem is lagay ng lagay. Haven't yet fixed that problem.
Blogie says Jan 26, 2009 12:47PM guys, thanks for your input. i can now blog about this issue better. it'll come out on www.angdabawenyo.com soon!
timoyness says Jan 26, 2009 12:47PM pasingit about ticketing: kung mas convenient lang mag bayad ng traffic tickets (like a billing system) i think there'd be a lot less lagay
Blogie says Jan 26, 2009 12:48PM timoyness: sana nga automated na lahat... *sigh* (but srsly, pls start a new plurk on that. hehehe)
Your Daddy says Jan 26, 2009 12:48PM Damn, DUI. Vodka + weed + driving = almost crashed my car down a cliff. Good thing I just did a 4 wheel cartwheel....
Your Daddy says Jan 26, 2009 12:51PM Oh shit, i think i just admitted I smoke weed and Drunk Drive....
Your Daddy says Jan 26, 2009 12:55PM SEE! SEE! RIGHT THUR! WE ARE SCARED SHITLESS! WE ARE LIVING IN A FASCIST STATE!!!!
Your Daddy says Jan 26, 2009 12:56PM That happed 10 years ago, so thats cool. I think the Statutes of Limitation has passed on that "crime".
timoyness says Jan 26, 2009 12:56PM to wrap things up... No to : No eating and drinking on smoking areas ( unsa na, sacred?) No to: controlling of cigs like it's a drug
timoyness says Jan 26, 2009 12:59PM haha ok. Yes to Sex, Smoking, Cholesterol and even more sex. there, fixed!
Blogie says Jan 26, 2009 12:59PM ok so i will link to this plurk fr my blog post -- hopefully i'll be able to publish it by tonight or tomorrow
Diyosa Blogger says Jan 26, 2009 06:42PM nakakahilo! Anyway, I think people should be given the choice to sit, drink, and eat in a smoking area.
Diyosa Blogger says Jan 26, 2009 06:43PM nobody is being forced naman to sit in the smoking area if they don't smoke. Diba?
Diyosa Blogger asks Jan 26, 2009 06:45PM bakit ka uupo sa smoking area kung ayaw mo sa secondhand smoke. Make sure uy! OA yung ordinance.
boink says Jan 27, 2009 02:39AM riajose: the problem with some of these smoking areas is what separates them from non-smoking areas: nothing.
Your Daddy says Jan 27, 2009 02:44AM establishments should follow the Smoking Area guidelines in the ordinance...
Your Daddy says Jan 27, 2009 02:47AM IMHO, the arrest of smokers using those Smoking areas is unlawful, they were after all using the "Designated" area thus "Following the Law"