krisandro asks Nov 17, 2008 12:46PM what's with women and their pocket-less shorts with pocket flaps.
daphnemaia says Nov 17, 2008 12:48PM hahahaha. the flaps make the butt look decorated! but girls r not supposed to put things in the back pocket. hence the pocketlessness.
orcasquall says Nov 17, 2008 12:52PM I think guys have pocketless shirts too. Just so it looks like there's a breast pocket.
shadeofmelon Nov 17, 2008 12:57PM you took a picture of someone's butt randomly? j/k. I honestly dunno why 'cos I dun own one. maybe I shld. haha.
krisandro says Nov 17, 2008 12:57PM But there is space for pockets! if one doesn't want to put anything, they need not. But there isn't a pocket at all!
orcasquall says Nov 17, 2008 12:58PM it's for deco. A lot of things on women's clothes are for deco, are they not?
daphnemaia says Nov 17, 2008 12:59PM Thr is space, but if women don't use it anyway, thn it's a waste of fabric. so why waste?!
krisandro says Nov 17, 2008 01:02PM if the deco is in the form of making it look like a pocket is there, y not just sew a real one!
krisandro says Nov 17, 2008 01:03PM okay. maybe the seamstress reduces production costs with the lack of pockets. But isn't it better for every1 to have pockets?
daphnemaia says Nov 17, 2008 01:11PM HAHAHA! i see that orcasquall has gd arguments. u understand women well. hurhur.
MR Chao! says Nov 17, 2008 01:15PM yeah it's actually quite redundant for girl's shorts/pants/jeans etc to have pockets.. It's rare to see something in them.
daphnemaia says Nov 17, 2008 01:16PM we GIRLS (not guys) dont mind holding things in hands. otherwise we can "tumpang" in our bfs' pockets. hahahaha
FoxTwo says Nov 17, 2008 02:10PM it's the same as gadgets lah... they want PRETTY gadgets... nevermind if it doesn't work.. as long as pretty can leow
elise says Nov 17, 2008 04:27PM i read the pocket flaps can make a buttless girl look like she has a butt!