amix says viva obama!

26 responses to this plurk.

• 
  October 04, 2008 at 21:56 amix oldie, but goodie
• 
  October 04, 2008 at 21:57 Prisqua
• 
  October 04, 2008 at 21:57 amix or is it viva mccain?
• 
  October 04, 2008 at 22:00 roadhacker that is AWESOME!
• 
  October 04, 2008 at 22:00 xgravity23 says ha ha, I say if McCain gets elected, then it's wholeheartedly Viva McCain. Imagining Palin as president gives me the runs.
• 
  October 04, 2008 at 22:03 roadhacker asks if you saw this? This SUMS it all up:
• 
  October 04, 2008 at 22:03 roadhacker blogs.venturacountystar.com/greenberg/qqxsgFiscalConservative.jpg
• 
  October 04, 2008 at 22:20 Kaji says Amusing, but a gross oversimplification; economies don't change overnight, and are rarely the product of just the president
• 
  October 04, 2008 at 22:20 Kaji says As Pelosi herself noted, 2 years into Clinton's administration we had a surplus, 2 years into Bush's we had a deficit
• 
  October 04, 2008 at 22:20 Kaji says Likewise, 2 years into Clinton's administration the Republicans took control of Congress, 2 years into Bush's administration the Dems got it
• 
  October 04, 2008 at 22:29 Feld surplus = tax >spend. FactCheck: US Treasury says Clinton's "projected" surplus never actually materialized: www.letxa.com/articles/16
• 
  October 04, 2008 at 22:31 Feld cool video, btw; wonder if it will help win Texas for Obama?
• 
  October 04, 2008 at 22:32 AZJazzyJ wants one of those hats and jackets. Those would be like babe magnets.
• 
  October 05, 2008 at 02:17 Doug_Quance Hey Kaji - you need a history lesson... which I'm not going to give you... that includes some accuracy in the dates you mention.
• 
  October 05, 2008 at 02:17 Doug_Quance while the Republicans DID take over congress after two years, it still took longer than that to drag Bill Clinton kicking and screaming to
• 
  October 05, 2008 at 02:18 Doug_Quance a balanced budget. In Bush's case, the Democrats did not take control until after six years of the Bush admin.
• 
  October 05, 2008 at 02:26 Doug_Quance Maybe this will help you jog your pre-pubescent memory:
• 
  October 05, 2008 at 02:27 Doug_Quance Don't mind me... but sometimes the thought of young people voting scares the shit out of me.Your teachers lied to you; the media lies to you
• 
  October 05, 2008 at 02:27 Doug_Quance ... and you're not old enough to really know what is going on.
• 
  October 05, 2008 at 02:32 Telperion says my Spanish is so rusty...but nice tune
• 
  October 05, 2008 at 07:35 kristianuffe says
• 
  October 05, 2008 at 10:52 debolsillo says to my american friends
• 
  October 05, 2008 at 12:55 tveon says Doug_Quance: You never get *old* enough to vote - age and insight is not necessarily correlated!
• 
  October 05, 2008 at 12:58 tveon says You could probably demand some level of education (e.g. high school) of your voters, but that would take the fun out of campaigning!
• 
  October 05, 2008 at 14:20 Doug_Quance tveon while I do agree to an extent, wisdom is usually gained through experience - which young people lack. Just look at the Obamabots!
• 
  October 05, 2008 at 14:21 Doug_Quance That's why it's all soundbites without much substance. "Change we can believe in" is easier for young-uns to understand.