June 04, 2008 at 13:20MerrycricketsaysIf Jail = Pokey, the Plurk Jail = Plurky.
June 04, 2008 at 13:28nibblersaysWhere, in this case it's a good thing generally I'd hate to see it used as a precedent for "hey I normally use this handle... give it to me"
June 04, 2008 at 13:35slaguzmansaysnibbler Not everybody is as famous as Scoble. If I demanded my name, no one would care.
June 04, 2008 at 13:44nibblersaysslaguzman true but I'd raise a stink if they did it for scoble and not me.. think they did the right thing but think it might be a problem
June 04, 2008 at 13:47PhoenixREGuythinksall the hype over a freaking screen name is ridiculous
June 04, 2008 at 13:50nibblersaysphoenixREGuy I'm sure as far as RS is concerned, scobleizer is more then a screen name, it's branding
June 04, 2008 at 14:01Bwanasaysthank goodness we can put this behind us
June 04, 2008 at 14:13johnfanelliasksdid the "thief" have a good reason for using the name? Did we even ask him why?
June 04, 2008 at 14:20DavidWardsaysway to go Robert, you've got to protect your brand!
June 04, 2008 at 14:24skipjackbranding or not, it sounds like whining to me
June 04, 2008 at 14:47fbrunelsaysnice, that's a good news. I guess you scared them.
June 05, 2008 at 07:29ChrisAldrichsaysThis simple step, hopeully followed by some additional API support and some good uptime, may be the tipping point for Plurk over Twitter.