Madame Maracas Aug 22, 2008 09:11AM he's still over in Twitter and FriendFeed and what not from what I can see. For a guy that's supposed to be bleeding edge. He's not.
Madame Maracas Aug 22, 2008 09:15AM aww thanks TBM. When I was on Twitter all the time I enjoyed his posts, interesting & all but he's just not a Plurker, dunno why.
Madame Maracas thinks Aug 22, 2008 09:18AM of Twitter as broadcasting, spraying out stuff, not so interested in replies and conversation. We KNOW Plurk is different than that!
PlurkingPoppa says Aug 22, 2008 10:53AM that his presence on the browse page was an excellent reminder of a problem with the karma algorithm (ie negative penalties).
PlurkingPoppa wonders Aug 22, 2008 10:55AM if Plurk made a recent change to relax that a bit and allow a single 4-hr k-increment of inactivity without a penalty?
PlurkingPoppa Aug 22, 2008 10:56AM didn't plurk/reply during the midnight-4am increment last night and got 0.00 instead of -0.16
PlurkingPoppa Aug 22, 2008 11:20AM also thinks that bots (like this one) should result in a -10.0 k penalty.
Yashoo Aug 22, 2008 11:39AM didn't plurk/reply during the midnight-4am increment last night and got karma penalized
PlurkingPoppa asks Aug 22, 2008 12:15PM if Yashoo plurked or replied in the increment prior to that one?
skraggy hopes Aug 22, 2008 12:28PM that means plurk changed the method of how they choose who to display.
MikePoz90 says Aug 22, 2008 12:29PM Is it possible to get into negative Karma? if so he should be -20 by now.
yay to that! 
heehee 
