ikepigott thinks Plurk is too much Wurk. Let the updates come to me, don't make me play Whack-a-Mole, clicking all over the damned place like a video game.

11 responses to this plurk.

• 
  June 01, 2008 at 20:39 GeekMommy says I totally agree - and it does that if we're on the individual plurk page... buttttt...
• 
  June 01, 2008 at 20:45 geechee_girl is underwhelmed by Plurk thus far.
• 
  June 01, 2008 at 20:49 GeekMommy says really getting sick of the scroll-click-scroll-click to keep up
• 
  June 01, 2008 at 21:21 rockinprgirl says now the scroll-through, constantly clicking thing is annoying. Twitter is by far easier in that respect.
• 
  June 01, 2008 at 21:36 ayse says yes, keeping up w/ the multiple conversations has gotten increasingly harder, and so far i'm following >10 people
• 
  June 01, 2008 at 21:40 helmsb says my God I'm exausted I need a protein shake just to have enough energy to read the latest posts
• 
  June 01, 2008 at 21:45 mojodenbow thinks that Twitter got a bad response 2 yrs ago & is still growing. Wait & see here PLurk
• 
  June 01, 2008 at 21:50 LenEdgerly Playing Whack-a-Plurk is addictive but not sustainable, I'm afraid.
• 
  June 01, 2008 at 21:51 ikepigott thinks Scoble will beat the Carpal Tunnel API limits, by using a second mouse.
• 
  June 01, 2008 at 21:52 Connie says Already getting error message: "This plurk appears to be deleted." But if you click on it again, all the replies load.
• 
  June 28, 2008 at 22:20 tatonca thinks Plurk is way more engaging than Twitter... but then I'm really just looking for a status aggregator. But difficult to use?... umm ok...