Smiley Jul 24, 2008 09:29PM Erm, about 96 on my minimal PC, 192 on the normal viewer on my powerful PC and 96 on the Shadow Draft viewer on my powerful PC.
Sougent says Jul 24, 2008 09:33PM 64 if I'm inside, dancing or something, 192 to 256 normally, 512 when I'm out someplace with lots of eye candy to see
Sougent says Jul 24, 2008 09:51PM geez louise, how long does it take at that setting bfore you crashe?
Smiley says Jul 24, 2008 09:54PM Or one 9800GX2. Though that'll make the viewer run at a painful speed. Two would make it run at about 30FPS.
Jessyka says Jul 24, 2008 09:55PM Usually around 400. If I really need the extra few FPS, I'll go down to 200.
Tenebrous Jul 24, 2008 09:56PM hasn't actually crashed at 4096 yet... but doesn't leave it on for very long... lol
Smiley says Jul 24, 2008 09:57PM Using a graphics setting which makes your GPU run at under 10 is not so healthy. Since it's not supposed to be used like that, it could...>
Smiley says Jul 24, 2008 09:57PM <...seriously damage the thing. Which is why after 4 years of usage my Geforce 5200 FX burned up, and slightly exploded.
Smiley says Jul 24, 2008 10:00PM Well, no cooling issues. It *is* in a normal "hole", but when I do stuff that are even *slightly* graphics-intensive I take it out and...>
Smiley says Jul 24, 2008 10:00PM <...put it in a spot where it has *plenty* of room to "inhale" and "exhale" from. Like near the middle of it.
GoSpeed says Jul 24, 2008 11:04PM 200 most of the time. 64 i doors and 256+ when I want to look far or am taking outside pics
Vidal Tripsa Jul 25, 2008 12:15AM "It always used to be 512m, but since the Grid became damned slow I usually have it on 256 to load stuff quicker."
Tenebrous wishes Jul 25, 2008 10:48AM there were a way to add a little draw-distance slider right on the main UI
Smiley Jul 25, 2008 02:54PM meant by there it would run at 30 FPS with 4096 drawing distance and all enabled. I get 30FPS with my 8600GT.
Smiley wants Jul 25, 2008 03:05PM that GPU. Will get same power at lower price though with my next PC. (Dual SLI of two 8600GTs with 1GB VRAM each)
Smiley says Jul 25, 2008 03:10PM Because 8800 is 33x integrated graphics and 8600GT is 17x, and buying 2 8600GTs costs less than one 8800 with half the memory 2 8600GTs...>
Smiley says Jul 25, 2008 03:11PM <...would get. So, HA! A little more power and double the memory for 50-100NIS less.
Codie says Jul 25, 2008 03:15PM i know they are cheaper but i doubt the ram changes much. if i get a second 8800gts it would beat the shit out of those even at 512megs
Codie says Jul 25, 2008 03:16PM anyways it will still be a nice setup, im sure you will have much fun with it
Smiley says Jul 25, 2008 03:17PM Then I could beat the shit out of your dual SLI setup with 2 8800s by buying *another* 2 8600GTs for less and use 'em all with Quad SLI.
Smiley says Jul 25, 2008 03:18PM And the RAM *could* change much. The more, the less blurry textures are, even if I for example render about 4 regions. ;D
Codie says Jul 25, 2008 03:24PM LOL who wants to render 4 regions Smiley? and same goes for quad cards, tho more than 2 wont fit on my board for sure.
Smiley says Jul 25, 2008 03:28PM (a) People who would like to take hi-res multi-region photos, like an overall picture of a person's 4 owned and linked regions, and (b)...>
(Dual SLI of two 8600GTs with 1GB VRAM each) 
