| geoffliving | asks | is it more important to be active in a few socnets or present in all? |
| AmberCadabra | i'm WAY on the side of active in a few. But if you're in this space for a living, you need to at least be familiar with them. |
| AmberCadabra | i just don't know that you can be a valuable participant if you're spread too thin. |
| tamar | i say you best be an expert within a few but have familiarity with all of them. that way you can cover your bases. |
| ConnieBensen | ping.fm made me realize that... there are many & I'm in quite a few... but I'm trying a new experiment with that |
| davidmullen | says | should be aware of/familiar with as many as possible, active participant in those you think bring most value. |
| davidmullen | says | if sm is about community, you can't be a good neighbor in all sm. unless you quite your job and just do that 24/7. |
| davidmullen | says | *quit (not quite) |
| vangogh | says | active in a few is more important, but no reason you can't still be present in most if not all |
| vangogh | says | depends on how present you want to be |
| geoffliving | says | blogging this. |
| Connie | You can only be active in a few, and only need to be unless you're like us -- needing to know what's available when advising clients. |
| Connie | I've got profiles everywhere but am only active here, on Twitter and Facebook. Occasionally the SWOM group on Ning. |
| geoffliving | says | Connie our socnet profiles match perfectly |
| GHollingsworth | I have to agree, I have lots of profiles, but I am only active on a few sites. |
| Connie | Geoff, that comes as no surprise. |
© copyright 2007-2012 Plurk Search People Search Verified Account APIFAQ
Contact Us About Blog Jobs Terms Privacy
