geoffliving asks is it more important to be active in a few socnets or present in all?

15 responses to this plurk.

• 
  July 11, 2008 at 03:19 AmberCadabra i'm WAY on the side of active in a few. But if you're in this space for a living, you need to at least be familiar with them.
• 
  July 11, 2008 at 03:20 AmberCadabra i just don't know that you can be a valuable participant if you're spread too thin.
• 
  July 11, 2008 at 03:21 tamar i say you best be an expert within a few but have familiarity with all of them. that way you can cover your bases.
• 
  July 11, 2008 at 03:28 ConnieBensen ping.fm made me realize that... there are many & I'm in quite a few... but I'm trying a new experiment with that
• 
  July 11, 2008 at 03:33 davidmullen says should be aware of/familiar with as many as possible, active participant in those you think bring most value.
• 
  July 11, 2008 at 03:33 davidmullen says if sm is about community, you can't be a good neighbor in all sm. unless you quite your job and just do that 24/7.
• 
  July 11, 2008 at 03:34 davidmullen says *quit (not quite)
• 
  July 11, 2008 at 03:36 vangogh says active in a few is more important, but no reason you can't still be present in most if not all
• 
  July 11, 2008 at 03:37 vangogh says depends on how present you want to be
• 
  July 11, 2008 at 03:56 geoffliving says blogging this.
• 
  July 11, 2008 at 04:11 Connie You can only be active in a few, and only need to be unless you're like us -- needing to know what's available when advising clients.
• 
  July 11, 2008 at 04:11 Connie I've got profiles everywhere but am only active here, on Twitter and Facebook. Occasionally the SWOM group on Ning.
• 
  July 11, 2008 at 10:38 geoffliving says Connie our socnet profiles match perfectly
• 
  July 11, 2008 at 13:12 Greg Hollingsworth I have to agree, I have lots of profiles, but I am only active on a few sites.
• 
  July 11, 2008 at 13:45 Connie Geoff, that comes as no surprise. I replurked and tweeted the link to your post on this. Well done, amigo.